Search for: "Law v. State"
Results 921 - 940
of 173,104
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2009, 2:10 am
Regina (Al-Saadoon and Another) v Secretary of State for Defence Court of Appeal “Iraqi detainees held in a United Kingdom internment facility in Iraq on the authority of the local criminal court were not under the jurisdiction of the UK for the purposes of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
28 Sep 2006, 10:08 am
Hunter v. [read post]
23 Jan 2022, 7:33 am
Substantial Connections are Crucial The case of J.R. v E.M., 997 N.Y.S.2d 669, (Suffolk County S.Ct. 2014) gave the following analyses of the more current state of the law on choosing which state laws should be applied. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 7:11 am
Next month the state of Arizona is expected to file a cert. petition seeking review of the Ninth Circuit’s decision, which upheld a district court’s order enjoining the state from enforcing several sections of S.B. 1070, the state’s immigration law enforcement legislation. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 6:27 am
Lopez v. [read post]
25 Jul 2015, 5:00 am
This follows a number of landmark cases including Wheaton v Peters 33 US (8 Pet) 591, 668 (1834), Banks & Bros v West Publishing Co 27 F 50 (CCD) Minn, 1886, right up to the case of the State of Georgia v The Harrison Company 548 F Supp 110 (N d Ga 1982). [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 10:13 pm
In the course of writing a forthcoming Update: Costs for the Solicitors Journal, concerning naming the wrong defendant in a CFA, I was considering the case of Law v Liverpool City Council [2005] EWHC 90020 (Costs) which deals with this issue. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 9:22 pm
Here is the abstract: Following Soto v State (1999), New Jersey was among the first states to enter into a comprehensive Consent Decree with the U.S. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 4:05 pm
United States and Free Exercise after Fulton (75 ALA. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 5:14 pm
After 10 years of mouldering on law library shelves, the Scalia dissent in Morrison v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 8:46 am
The defendant’s merits brief in United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 3:37 am
Adedoyin v Secretary of State for the Home Department: [2012] EWCA civ 939; [2012] WLR (D) 206 “Where the Upper Tribunal had properly directed itself as to its approach on an appeal from a determination of the First–tier Tribunal and had arrived at a conclusion which was open to it, the decision of the Upper Tribunal contained no material error of law and so the Court of Appeal should not allow an appeal from that decision, even if… [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 4:27 am
In Secretary of State for Health v Servier Laboratories Ltd, where the loss arose because there were no generic equivalents of the invalidly-patented drug, the Supreme Court held that the "dealing requirement" laid down in OBG Ltd v Allan [2008] 1 AC 1, which states that the unlawful means should have affected the third party’s freedom to deal with the claimant, is a necessary element of the tort. [read post]
16 May 2008, 1:59 am
It did not preclude a more general consideration of whether a listed state's laws and practices were Convention compliant, therefore the list system was not incompatible with art 3 of the Convention. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 4:30 am
Last year, the Supreme Court decided Wyeth v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 4:00 am
United States. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 8:23 am
In State v. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 7:33 am
Washington—and the per curiam opinion in Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
12 May 2016, 12:30 pm
On April 18, 2016, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments inUnited States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 4:12 pm
On June 23, 2016, the Supreme Court decided United States v. [read post]
