Search for: "People v. Free" Results 921 - 940 of 16,172
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The Supreme Court answered that question in the 1898 case of United States v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 3:02 am by INFORRM
  As Lord Neuberger says: “It is true that the book contained material which some people might find offensive, in terms of what was described and how it was expressed, but “free speech includes not only the inoffensive but the irritating, the contentious, the eccentric, the heretical, the unwelcome and the provocative provided it does not tend to provoke violence” – see Redmond-Bate v. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 3:20 am
From my previous post: "The California Supreme Court decision is People v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 7:28 am by Catherine Fisk
  Unions strenuously oppose them because they believe it violates their own First Amendment rights to be legally compelled to provide free legal services to people who choose not to join. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 12:02 pm
Millions of people (including quite a few in the legal profession) have lost their jobs. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 9:55 am by admin
When giving way to free speech, should human rights of the people who are targeted be neglected? [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
As the Supreme Court observed in the context of high school students in Tinker v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 1:26 am by rhapsodyinbooks
” Citing previous rulings of the Court, she observed: “The hallmark of the protection of free speech is to allow “free trade in ideas”–even ideas that the overwhelming majority of people might find distasteful or discomforting. [read post]