Search for: "People v. Superior Court"
Results 921 - 940
of 3,634
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2014, 11:13 am
(Home Ins., supra, 34 Cal.4th at p. 1037; People v. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 11:07 am
It was initially filed in " state court" December 2008 (Orange County Superior Court, Case No. 30-2008-00116748-CU-MC-CJC), and was removed to the U.S. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 5:26 am
Option 1 was rejected as too narrow, leaving the possibility that serious errors of law affecting large numbers of people would go uncorrected. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
Labuda in People v. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 4:30 am
A good example is what happened in Gandy v. [read post]
25 Jan 2014, 12:06 pm
Co. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 4:10 am
According to the complaint (full text) in Mee v. [read post]
3 Feb 2007, 2:47 pm
The Court relied on the California Supreme Court's decision in People v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 10:02 am
Superior Court, S157001, a case that could limit plaintiffs' ability to challenge insurers under the Consumers Legal Remedies Act. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 12:04 pm
This Rosenberg v. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 10:39 am
Is there online chatter from possibly knowledgeable people about the underlying incident? [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 1:47 pm
" Although the standard of review of a trial courts factfinding is one of deference, Cesare v. [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 3:26 pm
Lodi v. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 5:01 am
” The federal Court of Appeals pointed out that it is not bound by a Maine Superior Court decision because a Maine Superior Court decision does not bind the Maine Law Court. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 5:01 am
” The federal Court of Appeals pointed out that it is not bound by a Maine Superior Court decision because a Maine Superior Court decision does not bind the Maine Law Court. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 5:02 pm
We want people to have their claims heard on the merits, rather than dismissed for a legal reason that we got wrong, and denying res judicata to the second (totally identical) suit solves the problem. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 1:16 pm
In light of the conflict between our holding and the First Department's holding in People v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:02 pm
Today, the Supreme Court of California in Winn v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 7:28 am
Tayar v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 5:58 am
His latest one, Espenscheid v. [read post]
