Search for: "State v. Austin"
Results 921 - 940
of 2,705
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2019, 8:00 am
Stephan v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 10:11 pm
Dist. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 10:30 am
Lyons v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:52 am
State Water Contractors v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 4:26 am
” For the Austin American-Statesman, Chuck Lindell takes note of the possible effects of the court’s partisan-gerrymandering cases on Abbott v. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 6:41 pm
Tomorrow, in Sole v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 7:55 pm
—Austin 2010, pet. filed). [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 3:00 am
DeStefano (07-1428) and Ricci v. [read post]
13 May 2018, 6:22 am
Cope and the 1998, Austin Court of Appeals opinion, Great Texas County Mutual Insurance Co. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
Citing Matter of Asch v New York City Bd. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
Citing Matter of Asch v New York City Bd. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 6:53 am
The trade union appealed, and the EAT’s judgment in the joined cases (USDAW v Ethel Austin Ltd and USDAW v WW Realisation 1 Ltd) was published yesterday. [read post]
28 May 2012, 1:08 pm
And as near as I can tell, the University of Texas-Austin undergraduate college, which is currently defending its affirmative action program before the Supreme Court in Fisher v. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 3:36 am
” At Big Think, Steven Mazie considers whether, if the Court were to strike down state bans on same-sex marriage, a state court judge could ignore that decision. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
During Tuesday’s oral argument before the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 9:03 pm
The federal Western District Court for Texas calls the United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 4:30 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 9:05 am
Instead, it would only settle if the case was terminated by means of an 'Agreed Order of Dismissal'UPDATE: Here's the detailed version of the 4/20 status hearing:Craig Conrath of the Department of Justice appeared on behalf of the United States, and Jack Bierig of Sidley Austin LLP appeared on behalf of NAR.Judge Denlow asked counsel to report on the status of apparently ongoing settlement discussions. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 11:25 am
Defendant Austin Simon is asserted to be the sole member of E Liquid Palace. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 2:48 pm
In 1990, in the case of Austin v. [read post]
