Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Price"
Results 921 - 940
of 4,401
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2021, 7:19 am
"The ability to increase prices without losing market share is characteristic of a monopolist. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 2:30 am
The low price is a key feature emphasised in the sites, typically with percentage reductions, and with higher prices being compared and struck though. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 5:26 am
FindWhat Investor Group v. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 5:30 am
Still a heavy price to pay for Nosal, who probably deserved a civil suit but definitely does not deserve to spend a year in prison.Connecticut:The case of Datto, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 11:14 am
Hoffman The Price of Pleasure [citation] Shari Motro When the Supreme Court Is Not Supreme [citation] Jason Mazzone ESSAYS Fixing RAM Copies [citation] Aaron Perzanowski People Are Not Bananas: How Immigration Differs from Trade [citation] Jennifer Gordon COMMENTS Strange Bedfellows? [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 8:00 am
This shows that Nokia is paying a significant price for its protracted dispute with OPPO. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 11:23 am
Wheeler, 254 U.S. 281, 293 (1920); Saenz v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 5:00 am
Otherwise, the market will have two categories of investors: regular people and people who are friends and families of insiders, said Kim.Avakian agreed. [read post]
9 May 2012, 4:37 am
She also admitted she gave “the same customer eleven boys' Polo shirts [valued at $385] without any payment” because “she was trying to make people happy. [read post]
25 Jan 2009, 1:17 pm
This case turns on the reading of the Medicaid provisions of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, which was passed in large part to stop elder law attorneys from "exploit[ing] loopholes to get people with means onto Medicaid. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 11:33 am
Flat fee v. pay per performance v. tournament—if you do very well, big payment, but otherwise nothing. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 9:01 pm
Co. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2009, 10:00 pm
Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007), and Iqbal v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 6:01 pm
To help resolve that question, the Ministry of Commerce of the People’s Republic of China filed an amicus curiae brief supporting the Chinese vitamin C sellers’ argument that China law required defendants to fix prices. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 6:01 pm
To help resolve that question, the Ministry of Commerce of the People’s Republic of China filed an amicus curiae brief supporting the Chinese vitamin C sellers’ argument that China law required defendants to fix prices. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 11:17 pm
For example, the famous US Supreme Court case of FTC v. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 3:46 am
Greenmoss Builders and Lozman v. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 11:17 pm
For example, the famous US Supreme Court case of FTC v. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 11:17 pm
For example, the famous US Supreme Court case of FTC v. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 10:30 am
Also, consider Brownmark v. [read post]
