Search for: "United States v. Englander" Results 921 - 940 of 2,087
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2014, 5:27 am
It sounds relaxing, indeed.* Patentability: a perpetual problem Jeremy reports on Peter Crowley v United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office, an extempore Patent Court, England and Wales, ruling in which Mr Justice Mann addressed the patentability of an invention consisting of a machine supposed to produce a surplus of energy to that which was needed in order to operate it. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 11:12 am by David Kopel
In 1998, the Supreme Court issued its most important modern decision on the Excessive Fines Clause, United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 8:04 pm
The legal position in England and the United States has now crystallised to leave no manner of doubt that a corporation would be liable for crimes of intent. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 10:00 pm
” One part of the aftermath of the disaster is little known in the United States: the resulting private prosecution. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Second, Sanambar v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Third, R (on the application of AB) v Secretary of State for Justice. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 1:48 pm
Whether their intentions are good or bad, it probably won't take long before the U.S. sees its own case of blog v. state. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (on the application of SM (Rwanda) (AP)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 10 May 2021 Kostal UK v Dunkley and Ors, heard 18 May 2021 Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 In the matter of an application by Margaret McQuillan for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), In the matter of an application by Mary McKenna for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), and In the matter of an application by Francis McGuigan for… [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 4:45 pm by Lawrence Solum
Rather, inspired by Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., the United States presently embraces them by willfully ignoring how Holmes punished Porfirio Díaz’s leading critic Eugene V. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 9:57 am by Lorelie S. Masters
However, as in civil procedure applicable in the United States, parties may move to compel disclosure if the opposing party refuses or fails to produce documents. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 10:09 am by Chip Merlin
United Fruit Co., 365 U.S. 731, 735 (1961) (stating the ‘boundaries of admiralty jurisdiction over contracts . . . have always been difficult to draw’ but contracts to insure a ship are maritime) (citing New England Mut. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
Why is so much happening in Canada and so little in the United States? [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 5:20 am by Kevin LaCroix
In doing so, Judge Holwell, by his own account, joined other courts in "rejecting the argument that a domestic transaction occurs whenever the purchaser or seller resides in the United States. [read post]
17 Apr 2022, 12:12 am by Frank Cranmer
Clare Ryan, Strasbourg Observers: Lee v the United Kingdom: A trend toward heightened pleading standards? [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 8:48 pm by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
  Mossoff's article is written in the wake of Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
  Ever since the United States Supreme Court decided Daubert v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
During Reconstruction, Democrats bitterly condemned how state equality in the Senate gave disproportionate power to New England states that were far more anti-slavery and racially egalitarian than the rest of the country. [read post]