Search for: "Good v. State"
Results 9381 - 9400
of 44,412
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2013, 8:47 am
Thaler, in which the Court held that when a state’s procedural framework makes it highly unlikely in a typical case that a defendant will have a meaningful opportunity to raise on direct appeal a claim that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance, the good cause exception recognized in Martinez v. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 4:16 am
One Wholesaler, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 9:56 pm
The applicant relied upon the ‘extended’ form of passing off (referred to in Chocosuisse Union des fabricants suisses de chocolat & Ors v Cadbury Ltd. [1999] EWCA Civ 856), which enables several traders to have rights over a sign which has acquired a reputation on the market (and whereby - as per the UK law of passing off - such notional use by another has constituted a misrepresentation, and damage was caused).The BoA had previously found that, whilst there was reputation… [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 12:57 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 6:18 am
State Farm Fire & Cas. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:45 am
LP v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 10:29 am
That case is Miranda v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 9:29 am
State v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 6:57 pm
Big Oil v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 2:34 pm
This is what distinguishes the present case from People v. [read post]
30 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
Ogden, Brown v Maryland, Willson v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 3:30 am
’” U.S. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 11:17 pm
Nebraska and Pierce v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 9:40 am
Especially given the first sentence of the fourth paragraph of Part II, in which Justice Bedsworth states:"If there is one thing four-year-old boys are usually good at, it is waking their parents. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 9:51 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 6:02 am
CHUNG v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 4:25 am
State St. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 8:42 am
The court summarizes: The primary effect of the DPIA provision is to compel speech…The State cannot insulate a specific provision of law from a facial challenge under the First Amendment by bundling it with other, separate provisions that do not implicate the First Amendment The court also says that the DPIA requirement “deputizes covered businesses into serving as censors for the State” because the DPIA risk “factors require consideration of content or… [read post]
:@WilliamBaude: The Important Choice of Law Questions Lurking in Tomorrow's Stolen-Pissarro Argument
17 Jan 2022, 10:08 am
[The applicability of Klaxon v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 6:00 am
Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 181-182 [1978]). [read post]
