Search for: "United States Department of Justice"
Results 9381 - 9400
of 27,278
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2019, 3:45 pm
In tax cases, the IRS and Department of Justice will generally prosecute cases under Title 26, the Internal Revenue Code. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 8:13 am
Editor’s Note: An earlier version of this post ran on April 2, 2019, as an introduction to this blog’s symposium on Department of Commerce v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 5:00 am
The humiliating disaster gave rise to a rare, publicly available Justice Department analysis of presidential power to wage covert war. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 2:00 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 10:59 am
” [United States v.] [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 10:21 am
Unlike the covert activities of state intelligence agencies, WikiLeaks relies on the power of overt fact to enable and empower citizens to bring feared and corrupted governments, and corporations to justice. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 8:38 am
United States, 449 U.S. 383, 385 (1981). [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 8:12 am
This creates a dilemma for the Department of Justice, apparently in the face of a June deadline. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 5:00 am
Representing a military veteran seeking to keep his lawfully adopted daughter in the United States. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
Confidential investigators employed by the New York State Department of Law are "confidential" employees within the meaning of the Taylor Law pursuant to §201.7(b).The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2019/2019_02812.htm [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
Confidential investigators employed by the New York State Department of Law are "confidential" employees within the meaning of the Taylor Law pursuant to §201.7(b).The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2019/2019_02812.htm [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 2:24 am
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 4:33 pm
By: Evan Schleicher On April 8th, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo announced that 16 Saudis, including one of the closest aides to Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, were being barred from entry to the United States under Section 7031(c) of the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act of 2019. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 4:33 pm
By: Evan Schleicher On April 8th, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo announced that 16 Saudis, including one of the closest aides to Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, were being barred from entry to the United States under Section 7031(c) of the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act of 2019. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 12:19 pm
The plaintiff’s claims were essentially policy and training claims similar to claims settled by a Consent Decree in an action by the Department of Justice. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 9:00 am
On Wednesday, the justices hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 7:18 am
AP reports that the Department of Justice has dropped its appeal of the court's decision in United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2019, 4:44 pm
The ICC giving into the political influence of states is clearly an issue in the Afghanistan example, given that the investigation was halted due to a lack of support from the United States. [read post]
13 Apr 2019, 4:44 pm
The ICC giving into the political influence of states is clearly an issue in the Afghanistan example, given that the investigation was halted due to a lack of support from the United States. [read post]
13 Apr 2019, 12:41 pm
As a variation of this, perhaps the president might also argue that, as the Justice Department often has in court, he often speaks off-the-cuff and did not really mean his words to either McAleenan or the agents to be a directive—though such obscurity on a matter of legal compliance is not reassuring from the man tasked with “defend[ing] the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
