Search for: "United States v. Little"
Results 9421 - 9440
of 10,417
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2010, 2:14 pm
Depending on how those proceedings turn out, we could have either (a) a Ninth Circuit opinion -- whether by three judges or by the Court en banc, it does not matter -- laying down the law for the entire Ninth Circuit on same-sex marriages, or (b) a Supreme Court decision doing the same for the entire United States. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm
Hensley v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 7:13 pm
State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 2:21 pm
Alexandria Women's Health Clinic (1993) (interpreting § 1985(3)'s first clause); United Bhd. of Carpenters & Joiners of Am., Loc. 610, AFL-CIO v. [read post]
21 Nov 2024, 9:01 pm
More recently, in Freytag v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 7:41 am
” Brief for the United States as Amicus CuriaeSupporting Respondents, 2011 WL 741927, at *19, see Mensing, 131 S. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 11:00 am
Sierra Watch v. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 2:39 pm
Golden Door Properties, LLC et al. v. [read post]
1 May 2016, 1:49 pm
For example Williams v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 5:08 am
” Perkins v. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 3:38 am
The United States records one million COVID deaths. [read post]
16 Dec 2024, 5:23 am
Rejecting such a "free–floating test for First Amendment coverage," the United States Supreme Court declared in Stevens that the First Amendment's guarantee of free speech "does not extend only to categories of speech that survive an ad hoc balancing of relative social costs and benefits. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 1:15 pm
However, since the New Streamlined Procedures are now available to U.S. taxpayers residing in the United States, the 2014 OVDP is intended to be used by taxpayers who have serious concerns with criminal violations. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 3:11 pm
In United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 5:05 am
§2383, which covers participation in rebellion or insurrection, and which provides that those found guilty "shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 6:57 pm
Under the FISA Amendment Act of 2008, reauthorized in 2012, warrantless wiretapping was approved by federal authorities, although this is currently being challenged and fought against via the recent decision of the United States Supreme Court in Clapper v. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 12:18 am
(Class 46) New Zealand Two for one in the House: Treaties and Anti-Counterfeiting Bill (International Law Office) South Africa 'Softlifting' adds to South African piracy woes (Afro-IP) Spain 'Theory of consumer error' rejected in criminal trade mark proceedings in Spain (Class 46) Switzerland Swiss Federal Institute of Intellectual Property (IGE) reports progress in quest for improving legal protection for ‘Made in… [read post]
17 May 2007, 4:49 pm
"Now, imagine you are the CEO or General Counsel of a telcom company that has been assisting the NSA in electronic surveillance for two years, assured that what appear to be your violations of FISA do not subject you to legal exposure because you have been relying on the certification "by the Attorney General of the United States that no warrant or court order is required by law. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 1:16 pm
Yet, for a variety of reasons, it has apparently done little of either? [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 10:36 am
The other amendments of the United States Constitution's Bill of Rights inspire public adoration and volumes of legal research. [read post]
