Search for: "In INTEREST OF FEW v. State"
Results 9441 - 9460
of 11,606
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2020, 3:42 pm
With respect to data security, there are few more useful and concise statements than the “Charney Theorem,” which states: “there’s always a percentage of the population up to no good. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 2:46 am
” Winters v. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 8:16 am
That, in turn suggests that all sides are now deeply engaged in covert or undisclosed activity to advance interests. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 12:52 pm
FTC v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 1:11 am
Any or all of the four potential reasons stated above would be plausible here. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 9:34 pm
Prior to that I'd like to note two things:The timing of the new lawsuit -- a few weeks before a breach-of-FRAND-contract jury trial (scheduled to begin on August 26) -- is a clear message that Google remains opposed to the idea of having its worldwide SEP issues with Microsoft resolved in the United States. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 9:18 am
" Microsoft has been saying for at least a few months now that this deal is very much about mobile.As a developer who considers the current state of affairs in mobile app distribution unsustainable, I don't know whether I may in the end submit apps to the platform's default stores (who may become much more developer-friendly in the face of real competition), an Epic Games Store, a Microsoft Xbox Store, or whatever combination. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 4:55 am
A few years later P3 comes along. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 7:20 am
Nearly all of the interested parties support keeping the settlement in place but the United States government--in its capacity as what Deputy SG Curtis Gannon called its "watchdog" role--objected that the bankruptcy court lacks authority to release third parties like the Sacklers (who did not file for personal bankruptcy) from liability. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 2:13 pm
The argument was both fascinating and confusing, and it will not be an easy task to sort it all out for the interested lay reader.Perhaps the best way to go about this is first to state a number of propositions upon which all appeared to agree, and then go from there.First, the appellate counsel on both sides did a great job of holding up under fire. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 10:40 am
While these search results seem a little funky, the search term “1-800 Contacts Cheaper Competitors” is a VERY long-tail query that few, if any, consumers actually tried. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 8:17 am
In State v. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 1:19 pm
Overjet, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2025, 8:35 am
Recent Relevant Case LawA few decisions in the last couple of years represent different, apparently divergent positions in EPO case law and which are relevant for the present referral. [read post]
18 May 2023, 10:28 am
SH Synergy, LLC v. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 7:18 am
As Justice Harlan wrote in Cohen v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 4:18 am
Over the past few years, courts have interpreted the Fourth Amendment broadly in some interesting ways. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 2:13 pm
Thompson Co. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2024, 8:03 am
In Doe v. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 3:16 am
AND ALSO OF INTEREST . . . [read post]
