Search for: "Ex Parte May"
Results 9461 - 9480
of 12,870
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2011, 7:23 am
A modern, transparent, independent complaints resolution system is a key part of that. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 6:19 am
Be sure to notice all the parties for the ex parte. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 6:19 am
Be sure to notice all the parties for the ex parte. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 6:00 am
As a continuing part of this representation, Ms. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 9:59 pm
If you are a victim of securities fraud, you may be able to recover your losses. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 5:25 pm
The law enforcement agency may make an ex parte application stating good cause for an order extending the time to file a petition. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 11:15 am
The threat of ex post liability may not suffice, given that the value of data is steadily rising while the criminal justice system remains slow and cumbersome. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 6:20 am
The second fiction is a counter to the Ex nihilo nihil fit argument. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 3:41 am
The circumstances in which a court may order a retrial are set out in section 7(1) of the Criminal Appeal Act 1968, which provides: Where the Court of Appeal allows an appeal against conviction and it appears to the Court that the interests of justice so require, they may order the appellant to be retried. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 1:48 am
The first two parts of this proposed section are unproblematic and, incidentally, 35.5.2 is really just a statement of already established law. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 9:15 am
As noted in MPEP 2286: Where a< request for ex parte reexamination * indicates (A) that it is filed as a result of >an order by a court or< an agreement by parties to litigation which agreement is sanctioned by a court, or (B) that litigation is stayed for the filing of a reexamination request >, the request< will be taken up by the examiner for decision 6 weeks after the request was filed >, and all aspects of the proceeding will be expedited to the extent… [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 9:00 am
(a), it states in pertinent part: "[w]hen service of a summons has not resulted in actual notice to a party in time to defend the action and a default or default judgment has been entered against him or her in the action, he or she may serve and file a notice of motion to set aside the default or default judgment and for leave to defend the action. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 6:35 am
Thunberg also sped up the payments by agreement with his ex-wife, without telling the trustee, and used part of his payments for private purposes. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 7:34 pm
Stephens was convicted of possession of child pornography and as part of his sentence, was placed on probation. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 2:07 pm
In December 2010, the defendants of the lawsuit jointly filed ex parte requests for reexamination for two of the patents and then in May, 2011 filed an additional request for the '648 patent that had newly issued. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 12:49 pm
I'm going to list the Requirements for Innocent Spouse because I know some of you out there may be able to use it to solve your IRS debt brought on by a loving spouse (or ex-spouse!) [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 4:00 am
Finding employment is a critical part of re-entry. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 7:52 pm
Today an important filing was made---Doc 3423 Supplemental Memorandum filed by Plaintiff in In Support of 912 MOTION Supervise Ex Parte Communications with Putative Class (2).pdf In this filing efforts are made to bring to the attention of Judge Barbier the unfairness of how BP has handled the Interim Payment Process. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 8:28 am
One is left wondering whether or not Patentees are better off simply filing a patent owner initiated reexamination (ex parte) that may consider only patents and printed publications--and do it today rather than waiting for the proposed patent reform procedure. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 8:28 am
One is left wondering whether or not Patentees are better off simply filing a patent owner initiated reexamination (ex parte) that may consider only patents and printed publications--and do it today rather than waiting for the proposed patent reform procedure. [read post]
