Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office" Results 9501 - 9520 of 13,942
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2017, 7:48 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Initially, this might be interpreted as an administrative technicality over scheduling. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 2:18 pm
The probate court also appointed Lawrence Shadix as temporary administrator of Tapley’s estate. [read post]
2 Jul 2022, 1:54 pm by Eugene Volokh
Some might ask: Why doesn't the federal government go after the picketers under the federal law related to picketing the homes of judges, jurors, witnesses, or court officers (which is likely constitutional given Cox v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 5:14 am
Hewlett-Packard Co. v Acceleron LLC (Inventive Step) (IP Spotlight) District Court S D California.: Evidence relating to re-examination proceedings excluded from trial: Presidio Components Inc., v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 1:20 pm by Court C. VanTassell
Rule 16(b)(3)(v) is also amended to permit a court’s scheduling order to “direct that before moving for an order relating to discovery, the movant must request a conference with the court. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 9:29 am by Leonard L. Gordon and Joshua Nace
Epic Games will pay $245 million in consumer redress to settle the alleged Section 5 violations in an FTC administrative proceeding and will pay $275 million in monetary penalties to settle the COPPA action in federal court. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 7:32 am by John Elwood
The Court summarily reversed in yet another qualified immunity case, Taylor v. [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
On the same day there was a statement in open court [pdf] in the case of Sadler v Joyner read before Griffiths J. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 12:22 pm by Kevin Russell
A year earlier, Gorsuch had sounded some of the same themes in a decision for the court in De Niz Robles v. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 4:18 am by SHG
Von Raab, 489 US. 656 (1989), administrative inspection of closely regulated businesses, New York v. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 6:02 pm by Russell Knight
Administrative communications of either the clerk or the court are not subject to the electronic notice requirements. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 8:00 am by Alex Young
Nakashima v MTCC 818 Being short-staffed after the office administrator’s departure does not justify delay in responding to an owner, which delay constituted a records request refusal. [read post]