Search for: "Does 1 to 10" Results 9501 - 9520 of 42,997
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2017, 8:53 am by Tom Kosakowski
 Professional Jealousy Award -- In November and for the second year in a row, Montgomery College adopted all of the recommendations of its Ombuds, Julie Schwartz Weber.Surprised He Noticed Award -- In June in a speech to DOE staff, Secretary of Energy Rick Perry gave his full support for the Office of the Ombudsman.You Can Do That? [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 4:49 am by Jon Hyman
Mine are Archie Bunker at number 1, and David Brent at number 1(a). [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 7:24 am by Unknown
Slack concludes the shareholder does not have standing to sue over misrepresentations in the registration statement.The respondent shareholder counters that there is no conflict here because: (1) other cases involving registered and unregistered shares did not become available for trading on an exchange at exactly the same time unlike in this case; and (2) the phrase “such security” refers to any security of the same “nature and type” whether registered or… [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 7:52 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
L’Oreal S.A., No. 1:17-cv-00868 (D. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 1:15 am
    uses directly or indirectly any other means that does not comply with the principles of professional fairness and is likely to harm third-party activities. [read post]
2 Feb 2025, 10:19 am by Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo
The deadline for submissions is 1 April 2025. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 8:01 pm by Jamie Markham
Sentence A would get credit from 10/1 to 10/21: 20 days. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 2:20 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Additionally, the Efficiency Metric “allows the threshold to be applied evenly to most project types,” but it does not account for variations between different types of development; nor does it explain why the per person limit would be appropriately evenly applied despite project differences. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 9:20 am by Schachtman
Put differently, there are 10-to-l odds that the adverse effect is “real” (or about a 1 in 10 chance that it is not). [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 1:29 pm by Lawrence Solum
It is not clear or obvious from the text that Clause 1 authorizes supplying public goods or prohibits imposing regulations.203 And: Even if the foregoing arguments are deemed insufficient to displace the conventional understanding of the constitutional text, it does not necessarily follow that Clause 1 authorizes no regulation. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 4:00 am by Colin Lachance
Category 1 consisted of matters where I was right and category 2 consisted of matters that didn’t matter. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 11:46 am by Bexis
[T]he lack of an express preemption provision covering claims like [plaintiff’s] does not necessarily mean Congress intended to preserve conflicting state law. [read post]