Search for: "In re E.G."
Results 9541 - 9560
of 13,720
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2009, 4:15 am
Alternatively, a re-formulation of the rule on plurality of defendants might be envisaged in order to enhance the role of the courts of the Member State where the primary responsible defendant is domiciled. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 12:01 am
Natural Res. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 4:26 am
See, e.g., Kotler v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 3:01 pm
Although claim 1 as granted later stipulates that the damping ratio “may be set to any desirable constant or may be a variable calculated at the time of engagement or other convenient time”, it is perfectly possible, in the board’s view, that the setting of the damping factor to a desirable constant (e.g. a choice of one value amongst a set of constants) or to a calculated variable can be made dependent on the feedback component, e.g. such that a different… [read post]
10 May 2023, 6:46 am
Whilst the FCA is not proposing that product manufacturers are specifically required to re-approve all relevant products, it expects firms to identify any related issues as part of their ongoing review processes. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 11:57 am
In a similar vein, courts have recognized threats of concerted resignation as part of a pre-existing labor dispute to be protected (see, e.g., Crescent Wharf & Warehouse Co.). [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 5:29 am
Thompson, supra (quoting In re F.P., 878 A.2d 91 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania 2005). [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 2:28 am
There are also limits on how many times a landlord can withdraw and re-serve these notices. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 9:20 pm
Having a pending criminal charge might delay or harm certain immigration scenarios (e.g., delays in processing or granting immigration applications or delays, at the very least, being re-admitted to the United States when a non-United States citizen has a pending criminal charge). [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 1:39 pm
e) Forensic Expert (e.g., Accountants, Psychologists, Psychologists and Vocational): Very often, there are many issues that arise in a divorce that require outside experts. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 7:17 am
The fatality is not for a person (e.g., an animal). [read post]
31 Jan 2009, 6:30 am
See, e.g. , 8/3/07 Licare v. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 8:15 pm
The assumption that all lawyers are alike creates a logical fallacy (e.g. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
Given the lectures were all recordings, I could even re-watch sections to ensure I understood everything. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 11:00 am
Additional events (e.g., hackathons) will be scheduled throughout the year. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 2:06 pm
When employees are likely to be exposed to hazards like coronavirus (e.g., healthcare workers, airline and other travel industry personnel, laboratory workers, etc.), OSHA requires the employer to (1) conduct a “hazard assessment” of its worksite; (2) conduct employee awareness training; (3) develop procedures for issuing and using “personal protective equipment” like gloves and masks; (3) develop a reporting and surveillance mechanism for exposed employees; and (4)… [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 7:09 am
As a result, this may skew US policy in certain countries (e.g., "we're helping the bloggers and cyber-activitists, what more do we need to do? [read post]
8 May 2014, 4:00 am
See also In re Thornburg Mortgage Inc. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 9:26 am
But a low marginal cost to re-use—approaching zero for each use / copy / etc. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 7:30 am
Both hard (e.g., equipment) and soft (e.g., legal and engineering fees) costs would be reimbursable, but in the event that the reimbursement find is not sufficient to cover all costs, hard costs would be prioritized. [read post]
