Search for: "People v. Mays" Results 9541 - 9560 of 39,192
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2019, 3:56 am by Edith Roberts
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, in which the court will decide whether federal employment discrimination law bars discrimination against transgender people, arguing that “your freedom to rely on what the law says—and much more—may very well depend on the outcome. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 5:29 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The defendant supports his position on the rulings made in Kent v United States and People v Drummond. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 7:34 am by Kiran Bhat
Willis contends that the real issue in Freeman is “whether the price people pay for obtaining a mortgage must be transparent. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 11:45 am by admin
Yes, this poses lots of issues and problems, among them how do you investigate these people without letting them know that you want to terminate Jim? [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 6:24 pm by New York Criminal Defense
One such decision is that of the Court of Appeals in People v Johnson  (_ NY3d _ , 2016 NY Slip Op 02552 [4/5/16]), in which the Court rejected a defendant’s claim that the People’s use at his criminal trial of excerpts from certain recorded telephone calls defendant made to family and friends during his detention at Rikers Island Correctional Facility violated his right to counsel and were used without proper consent. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 7:34 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court notes that judges may issue protective orders forbidding dissemination of certain material to protect people from unfair embarrassment, etc. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 6:24 pm by Brian Shiffrin
One such decision is that of the Court of Appeals in People v Johnson  (_ NY3d _ , 2016 NY Slip Op 02552 [4/5/16]), in which the Court rejected a defendant’s claim that the People’s use at his criminal trial of excerpts from certain recorded telephone calls defendant made to family and friends during his detention at Rikers Island Correctional Facility violated his right to counsel and were used without proper consent. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 7:14 am by emp
Based on two reports I received – from people in the court room that day — the line of questioning from the bench would suggest that the Ontario Court of Appeal may well follow the UK House of Lords in recognizing that the tort of invasion of privacy does exist in the common law. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
I'd love to hear people's reactions and recommendations, since there's still plenty of time to edit it. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 3:40 pm by SJM
The relevant point here is at “(g) In considering the impact, the authority must assess the risk and extent of any adverse impact and the ways in which such risk may be eliminated. [read post]