Search for: "State v. Mark" Results 9541 - 9560 of 19,268
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2009, 6:30 am
The "Federal Rules of Civil Procedure govern the commencement of this suit for purposes of tolling the state statute of limitations. [read post]
24 Oct 2009, 10:06 am
The Court served the order by post on the flat – again returned marked gone away. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:00 pm
: (Danny Weitzner - Open Internet Policy), United States: How many lines is de minimis? [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 10:36 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Does think that internet makes exposure to other, distant marks more likely—Google gives me the nearest coffee shop first, but others in other states will also show up in the search results. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 7:54 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  As the Supreme Court has previously said, viewpoint discrimination is when the state is “attempting to give one group an advantage over another in the marketplace of ideas,” and that’s just not what the disparagement bar is. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 1:44 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (on the application of Afzal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7th June 2023. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 2:44 am
In Interflora Inc v Marks and Spencer Plc [2012] EWCA Civ 1501 Lewison LJ referred to Neutrogena [1996] R.P.C. 473 that:"...There is passing off even if most of the people are not fooled most of the time but enough are for enough of the time. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 7:23 pm
Akanoc (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) 9th Circuit Court of Appeals rejects appeal in AdWords antitrust case: Person v Google (Technology & Marketing Law Blog)   US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps Apple - USPTO rules Apple’s claims against Daniel Kokin over use of the mark ‘Video Pod’ should be decided at trial (Ars Technica) Tata Sons – MakeMyTrip (India) files suit against Tata… [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 1:20 pm
MillerFourth Amendment (search incident to arrest)State v. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 5:19 pm
Roberts, Jr., as the Court was about to wind up its hearing on Philip Morris USA v. [read post]