Search for: "Branch v. Mays"
Results 941 - 960
of 6,280
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2016, 4:02 pm
Social Media Companies who ask their employees to delete tweets may be acting unlawfully. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
Here are the discussion questions for Trump v. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 2:35 pm
As Judge Gregory Katsas recently noted in a concurring opinion in Palmieri v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:23 am
With the Civil Rights Act moving forward in the Senate, the Court refused to undercut the state action doctrine in Bell v. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 11:36 am
In Nexus Alarm & Suppression, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 5:30 am
In Myers v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:01 am
§ 301, presidential authority and functions may be delegated to “the head of any department or agency in the executive branch, or any official thereof who is required to be appointed by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 4:20 am
Dominguez v Mirman, Markovits & Landau, P.C. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 12:27 pm
But it may well be harder for them to win once they get inside the courthouse, or so it seemed after the Supreme Court on Wednesday went through an hour of oral argument in Hein v. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 5:25 am
May Dock Lane, LLC v Harras Bloom & Archer, LLP 2023 NY Slip Op 06244 Decided on December 6, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department illustrates the depth to which the Courts and the AD will go in considering a CPLR 3211 motion. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:14 pm
Indeed, Section 1226(a) provides that "On a warrant issued by the Attorney General, an alien may be arrested. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 11:38 am
In Marbury v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 1:20 pm
A motion pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(1) may be granted "only where the documentary evidence utterly refutes plaintiff's factual allegations, conclusively establishing a defense as a matter of law" (Goshen v Mutual Life Ins. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 8:44 am
The Seventh Circuit’s decision in McReynolds v. [read post]
3 May 2007, 8:43 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 1:51 pm
At least one of those individuals may assert that Trump is not lawfully the President because he was and remains ineligible under Section 3, so any removal of subordinate Executive Branch officers by Trump is invalid. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 10:55 am
In Julio Chicas v. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 3:07 pm
No discrimination shall be exercised, threatened, or promised by any person in the executive branch of the Federal Government against or in favor of any . . . applicant for a position in the competitive service because of his race, political affiliation, or religious beliefs, except as may be authorized or required by law). [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 11:00 am
NAACP and McAleenan v. [read post]
