Search for: "Bush v. State"
Results 941 - 960
of 4,156
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2013, 5:02 pm
The early complaints were decided under the Republican Administration of George Bush for the most part. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 2:58 am
In another case, however, DoJ declined to change course, and instead adhered to the wrongheaded position of the Bush administration.The other case is District Attorney's Office for the Third Judicial District v. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 12:35 am
Justice Department drew upon letter from Secretary of State Dean Acheson in its brief in Brown v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 7:30 am
Obama: EFF joined forces with ACLU, the ACLU of Idaho, Peter Smith, and Idaho State Rep. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 6:58 am
A system of executive primacy could be put into place only through constitutional amendment that complies with the procedures set out in Article V, and no such amendments exist. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 12:58 pm
Here, Christopher Rugaber writes in the Insurance Journal about the Court's decision to hear United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 11:41 pm
In a nutshell... it puts the uber-conservatives on our Supreme Court in the unenviable position of either having to stick to their "core" values upholding state's rights by giving their blessing (just couldn't resist ;) ) to gay marriage in the bay state... or show themselves to be the hypocrites (think Bush v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 7:26 am
Gore and Citizens United v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 3:49 pm
Earlier coverage of Medellin v. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 7:36 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
** In Friends of Pine Bush v Planning Bd. of City of Albany (71 AD2d 780), Appellate Division, Third Department, found that "[a]s residents of the city, the individual petitioners are persons aggrieved by a decision of the planning board and thus have standing to bring this proceeding", while in Zehner v Board of Educ. of the Jordan-Elbridge Cent. [read post]
15 May 2013, 7:48 am
Goldstein, P.C., was among the counsel to the respondents in Bush v. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 1:29 am
A "patchwork" of state laws on the matter would be bad for the country and, in any event, the federal standards will apply to "all 50 states. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 2:38 pm
As this dispute reached Justice Kagan on April 9, it was primarily a test of whether the Court would now apply the Bush v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 8:00 pm
The test case is Texas v. [read post]
8 Nov 2006, 3:56 pm
United States, United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:25 pm
In a 5-4 climate decision, the Court ruled against the Bush Administration in Massachusetts v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:02 am
Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley In 2013, the Supreme Court ruled in United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 4:31 pm
(The attorneys hold different political philosophies and argued opposing sides of Bush v. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 5:31 pm
President Bush accepted the judgment and asked state courts to review the cases. [read post]
