Search for: "People v. Price"
Results 941 - 960
of 4,339
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2015, 10:49 am
Nedschroef Detroit Corp. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 2:41 am
The company may have succeeded in creating a lasting new way for transporting people around (unless regulatory and legislative pushback, such as the recently enacted law in California requiring the business to treat drivers as employees rather than contractors, here, becomes widespread), but the long-term effect may be to turn it into a commodity, where familiarity with local market conditions and price competition, not brand strength, are paramount. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 10:33 am
Co. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 11:45 am
In the seminal Supreme Court case of Dirks v. [read post]
8 May 2007, 1:32 am
Harding NASSAU COUNTYCriminal PracticeDefense Counsel's Conduct in Family Court Matter Did Not Warrant Disqualification in Instant Case People v. [read post]
11 May 2007, 12:59 am
Grasso, defendant-appellant
NEW YORK COUNTYSchools and Education Court Rejects Parents' Challenge to New York City Education Department's Cell Phone Ban in Schools Price v. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 4:55 am
In Biden v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 8:30 am
MacPherson v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 2:40 pm
In Davis v. [read post]
30 May 2007, 4:08 am
McNeil Nutritionals, LLC v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 2:19 am
Now, in the sixth line of Price v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm
Oracle v. [read post]
23 Jul 2022, 12:36 pm
SEC v. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 1:03 pm
On appeal, the Sixth Circuit primarily relied on Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 11:05 am
“Mainly because it’s forcing people to go through these types of motions for really no purpose whatsoever. [read post]
28 Oct 2024, 3:23 am
[4] CFTC v. [read post]
22 Mar 2008, 9:00 pm
Cohen v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:05 am
LinkedInFacebook v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 9:00 am
Because law belongs to the people, the governments and courts that issue law must make it available to the people. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 3:14 am
Craig & Bishop, Inc. v. [read post]
