Search for: "Peter Charles" Results 941 - 960 of 1,468
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2019, 11:48 am by Jason Rantanen
(Daily.2016.Professors) Tristan Gray–Le Coz and Charles Duan, Apply It to the USPTO: Review of the Implementation of Alice v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 3:46 am by Adam Wagner
Allie Spence & Horne Solicitors Michael Ashe Southwark Law Centre Abimbola Badejo 5 Pump Court Rebecca Bahar Cambridge House Christopher Balog Arden Chambers Samitra Balu Tyndallwoods Solicitors Frances Barratt South West Law (Legal Services in the Community) Ltd Justin Bates Arden Chambers Ian Beachley Moss Beachley Mullem & Coleman Sophie Bell Hodge Jones & Allen LLP Lucia Benyu Peters Legal Ann Bevington Fisher… [read post]
27 May 2012, 5:42 pm by INFORRM
In the Guardian, Peter Preston argues “vulgar abuse has been part of the way we conduct our public business“. [read post]
17 May 2011, 7:23 am by Schachtman
Both aggregation and disaggregation of outcomes poses difficult problems for statistical analysis, and for epidemiology. [read post]
9 May 2012, 6:17 am by Rob Robinson
 bit.ly/JbOBCH (Mark Herrmann) International Companies Be Wary of Privacy Laws Overseas That Prohibit Transfer of Personal Data into U.S – bit.ly/JfeaCL (Kenneth Kelly, Diana Gomprecht) It’s Information Governance, Stupid - bit.ly/IppJI6 (Charles Holloway) Judge Carter’s DaSilva Decision: Cleared for Takeoff? [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 9:02 am
The case has also been cited by the top advocates of tort "reform" in their flagship pieces of literature including: Peter Huber in Galileo's Revenge, Walter Olson in The Litigation Explosion, and Charles Sykes's A Nation of Victims in ways that characterized the CAT scan case as "typical" of law related epidemics or as "an example of routine failure by the civil courts. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 12:00 pm
Talbot, and the star of Queer As Folk, Peter Paige. [read post]
4 Feb 2007, 11:59 pm
Court Clarifies 'Kangaroo' Comment The Recorder Retired San Joaquin County, Calif., Superior Court Judge Peter Saiers sounded almost smug upon learning three appellate justices had issued a ruling expressing their belief that he had, in fact, not called their court a "kangaroo court" during a 2005 hearing. [read post]