Search for: "Plante v. State" Results 941 - 960 of 4,069
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2009, 10:43 am
Today's entry focuses on the rule's application in the Sixth Amendment right to counsel context in Kansas v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 4:30 am by Steve McConnell
  Our tasty tater tot of a case for today’s consumption is Lederman v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 8:40 am by WIMS
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions   <> Larry Klein v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 6:36 pm
That's pretty good evidence that there really was something untoward going on in state court. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 10:45 am by Sarah Johnson Phillips
From my colleague, Andrew Moratzka: On June 7th, 2013, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit issued an opinion in Illinois Commerce Commission, et al., v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 9:06 pm by Dan Flynn
That question is being disputed during the pre-trial stage of the United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:23 pm
| Hospira v Genetech Mark 1, the Appeal | [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 7:55 am by Dan Farber
The first case, Turlock Irrigation District v. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 2:14 pm
(We all assume, as we must given the procedural posture of the case, that he's right; that state law didn't limit the plaintiff to only 12 plants.)Defendants then seek summary judgment on a stupid ground, which both the trial court and the Court of Appeal properly reject. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 11:28 am by Vicki Shiah
  On December 23, 2009, a proposed consent decree in the matter of Indeck Corinth, L.P. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2007, 9:09 am
He must not consciously mis-state the facts. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 5:54 am by David G. Badertscher
Senator Says Re-banning Animal Crush Videos 'A Virtual Certainty' A speedy Senate Judiciary Committee hearing this morning paid notice to animal rights groups that hope to flatten a resurgence of "animal crush" videos, an industry they say has regained ground after the United States v. [read post]