Search for: "Sales v. State"
Results 941 - 960
of 21,150
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2023, 9:15 am
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit erred in awarding civil remedies under the Lanham Act for infringement of U.S. trademarks through purely foreign sales that neither reached the United States nor confused U.S. consumers. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 9:15 am
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit erred in awarding civil remedies under the Lanham Act for infringement of U.S. trademarks through purely foreign sales that neither reached the United States nor confused U.S. consumers. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 2:10 pm
Ass’n v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 11:58 am
But some states like New York will look at them under the same test - meaning counsel must tailor them narrowly to protect an employer's business interest. -- Court: United States District Court for the Southern District of New York Opinion Date: 10/1/09 Cite: Cenveo Corp. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 12:56 pm
(Citibank was not required to produce a written agreement to recover on account-stated theory) -- CONTRA -- Tully v. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 11:30 am
The case is Thomas Estler, et al., Plaintiffs, v. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 8:44 am
Total Rebuild, Inc. v. [read post]
14 May 2022, 1:00 am
Rev. 116 (2021): The United States Supreme Court saved the states’ sales tax base in the landmark case of South Dakota v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:21 pm
See Ammerman v. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 8:30 pm
Indiana State Police Pension Trust v. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 8:33 am
The Ninth Circuit has posted to its web site an audio recording of Monday's oral arguments in UMG Recordings, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 5:07 am
Burden v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 9:00 pm
In Quill Corp. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 1:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 5:39 pm
Department of Revenue and Quill v. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 1:33 pm
Herring v. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 2:48 pm
” (Herrera v. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 1:10 pm
In 1972, the Supreme Court, in a landmark judgment (State of Punjab v. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 5:00 am
Specifically K-V wants a ban on the importation of all 17 HPC “except as authorized by [K-V]” and to prevent the sale or solicitation of 17 HPC within the United States from any imported source unless authorized by K-V. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 4:17 am
Galaxy Energy International Ltd v Murco Petroleum Ltd (M/V “Seacrown”) [2013] EWHC 3720 (Comm). [read post]
