Search for: "Singer v. Singer"
Results 941 - 960
of 1,270
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2010, 10:22 am
Long ago, the court in Singer v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 10:05 am
Design patent v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 4:55 am
Beyond that, guest blogger Dorothea Thompson observes, the practice appears to be rather disturbing to artists such as singer Kate Bush, and might amount to copyright infringement. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 7:22 am
Brown v. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 3:56 am
Sullivan, Roe v. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 2:39 pm
Order (Supreme Court, New York County), Gravano v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 4:17 am
Commentary on Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 2:39 pm
Order (Supreme Court, New York County), Gravano v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 6:11 am
: iLor v Google (ISinIP) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Princo - Misuse of a patent pool: En banc Federal Circuit to decide whether CD-R/RW patentees improperly sequestered alternative technologies: Princo Corp v ITC (Patently-O) (Filewrapper) US Copyright Radio ‘pay to play’ law ready for vote in House, Senate (Ars Technica) US Copyright – Decisions District Court N D California decision in Louis… [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 5:11 am
: iLor v Google (ISinIP) US Patents - Lawsuits and strategic steps Princo - Misuse of a patent pool: En banc Federal Circuit to decide whether CD-R/RW patentees improperly sequestered alternative technologies: Princo Corp v ITC (Patently-O) (Filewrapper) US Copyright Radio 'pay to play' law ready for vote in House, Senate (Ars Technica) US Copyright - Decisions District Court N D California decision in Louis Vuitton Malletier SA v Arkanoc Solutions, Inc et al -… [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 2:11 pm
Coventry Fire Dist., 981 F.2d 1358 (1st Cir.1992) (awarding damages to plaintiffs, but applying § 207(k), not § 207(a)); Singer v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 9:01 am
This is clearly permissible under Singer and is not foreclosed by Martin. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 1:40 pm
Singer Mfg. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 5:11 am
: iLor v Google (ISinIP) US Patents - Lawsuits and strategic steps Princo - Misuse of a patent pool: En banc Federal Circuit to decide whether CD-R/RW patentees improperly sequestered alternative technologies: Princo Corp v ITC (Patently-O) (Filewrapper) US Copyright Radio 'pay to play' law ready for vote in House, Senate (Ars Technica) US Copyright - Decisions District Court N D California decision in Louis Vuitton Malletier SA v Arkanoc Solutions, Inc et al -… [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 6:05 am
Serova v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 11:48 pm
Background The case concerns - briefly worded - proceedings between two plaintiffs, the first being a foundation managing the intellectual property rights of the late Austrian singer “Falco” established in Vienna (Austria), the second being a natural person domiciled in Vienna as well and a defendant domiciled in Munich (Germany) who are arguing about royalties regarding DVDs and CDs of one of the late singer’s concerts: While a licence agreement was… [read post]
2 May 2009, 3:15 pm
Earlier this week, in the FCC v. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 11:31 pm
IndiaTVF v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 8:23 am
In these cases, the Supreme Court has (despite NTPC v Singer) consistently rejected the suggestion that the designation of foreign proper law implies that foreign law governs the arbitration agreement or the conduct of arbitral proceedings as well. [read post]
22 May 2012, 2:30 am
Thirdly, the Court refers to the fact that New York was the seat of arbitration, and to Rule 57(2) of Dicey and Morris, which, of course, is the correct analysis but may be contrary to what the Supreme Court has held in NTPC v Singer and Bhatia International. [read post]
