Search for: "Tea v. State"
Results 941 - 960
of 981
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2016, 2:59 am
The clash came to a head in a decision this month by Brooklyn Commercial Division Justice Lawrence Knipel involving 4C Foods, a well-known, fourth generation, family-owned business that manufactures and markets under the 4C® brand grated Italian cheeses, bread crumbs, iced tea, and drink mixes. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 9:50 pm
Check out Scott Greenfield's post on Berghuis v. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 3:28 pm
“This is one more attempt to erase the history of the peoples of the former Soviet Union, including the heroic history, from historical memory,” Prime Minister Vladimir V. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 1:51 pm
LLC v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 8:55 am
Constitutional amendments outside of Article V? [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 9:31 am
The next photo almost caused us to do a spit take: They were looking in the drawer where they keep their coffee mugs–just in case there was a print-out jammed between the tea bags and the stevia. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
In R. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 9:00 am
CFPB Regulatory Reform Reading the tea leaves for other regulatory reforms by the CFPB presents more of a challenge. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 2:13 pm
But as the Supreme Court held in United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
The Independence Hall Tea Party will host its fourth annual Independence Day rally, "Celebrate American Exceptionalism. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 10:26 am
Biological Paternity Isn't Determinative - Cornelio v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 3:41 am
We don't chat on the phone, we don't stop by each others houses for tea. [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 10:52 am
"] From today's Second Circuit decision in Palin v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 12:56 pm
His work is going towards First Amendment because the other alternatives won’t get the job done and the present solution risks a serious chill.53 cell phone search cases found in his search for reported opinions after Arizona v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 5:38 am
This IMMI goes jointly to the Supreme Court for invalidating most of DOMA (the Defense of Marriage Act) in U.S. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 6:15 am
That’s the truth, so stop pandering to the Tea Party types, they’re short on facts, long on crazy… and won’t be voting for you in 2012 anyway. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:52 pm
That is more the function of state Supreme Court judges dealing with issues of state constitutional, statutory and common law, and even they are frequently constrained by federal constitutional law and federal preemption of state law. [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 9:02 am
It's hard to read the tea leaves: Livni stated the war aim more modestly ("We are fighting in order to weaken them and to affect their ability to target Israel in the future"). [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 7:35 am
” Take care with that social media duty of care October 2018: “[Rhodes v OPO] aptly illustrates the caution that has to be exercised in applying physical world concepts of harm, injury and safety to communication and speech, even before considering the further step of imposing a duty of care on a platform to take steps to reduce the risk of their occurrence as between third parties, or the yet further step of appointing a regulator to superintend the platform’s… [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 2:00 pm
”[28] V. [read post]
