Search for: "United States v. Kennedy" Results 941 - 960 of 4,168
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2007, 5:05 am
Here is the Syllabus of the case, which was decided today:SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES PHILIP MORRIS USA v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 11:28 am by Charles Davis
Kavanaugh’s views on that subject can best be inferred from an opinion he wrote shortly after the Supreme Court’s 2010 decision, written by Justice Anthony Kennedy, in Citizens United v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 1:50 pm
 The petitioner pointed out that the United States is different and that it would be difficult to define "technology based" in the United States. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 1:50 pm by Dennis Crouch
  The petitioner pointed out that the United States is different and that it would be difficult to define "technology based" in the United States. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 5:00 am by John Jascob
Raskin said that while a Constitutional amendment to reverse Citizens United is a long-term goal, Congress should now invoke Justice Kennedy’s admonition in Citizens United that the methods of “corporate democracy” can mitigate abuses by executives regarding corporate political spending. [read post]
9 Jun 2013, 1:55 pm
Privacy rights were outweighed by law enforcement interests in the United States Supreme Court's June 3rd ruling in Maryland v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 1:18 pm
UNITED STATES (No. 08-728) United States Supreme Court Opinion Decided: March 8, 2010 The Speedy Trial Act of 1974, 18 U. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 8:13 am by Adam Chandler
” Ruthann Robson of Constitutional Law Prof Blog notes that “[w]ithout much fanfare, President Obama signed into law the Animal Crush Video Prohibition Act of 2010, intended to cure the defects of the previous [animal cruelty] law, held unconstitutional last April in United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 4:31 pm by Ronald Mann
The tone of Hawkins’ argument was set three sentences into his presentation, when Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg interrupted to ask pointedly: “Is it not the case that no other political entity would be immune from such a quiet-title suit, not the United States, not a state of the United States, not a foreign government? [read post]