Search for: "United States v. Marshall" Results 941 - 960 of 2,293
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2022, 10:04 am by Josh Blackman
In 1803, through this case, the United States Supreme Court established its right to judicial review of congressional action The second sentence is not accurate, but I appreciate the recognition of Marbury's role. [read post]
22 May 2018, 10:16 am by Andrew Hamm
He used to tell the “story of how meaningful it was for him to go up to the podium and say, ‘I’m Thurgood Marshall and I’m representing the United States of America. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 11:44 am
Lohr, 518 U.S. 470 (1996), the most on-point United States Supreme Court decision in the area. [read post]
9 May 2019, 2:12 pm by Andrew Hamm
Vitale, “declaring that the state may not compel the recitation of a state-composed prayer in schools” Griffin v. [read post]
27 May 2012, 7:42 am by Jeff Gamso
"This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.And it's been settled (although sometimes unsettling) since Marbury v. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 6:36 am by Schachtman
INS, 240 F.3d 642, 645 n.7 (7th Cir. 2001) (Nazi deportation); United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 9:00 pm
He also said that the United States Marshals Service denied his request this year for a hernia operation, saying not unless the situation was life-threatening. [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
The book argues that the binary state-versus-federal-government model that is today taken to be the essence of American federalism does not correspond to the legal or political reality of the United States in the early nineteenth century. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 2:24 am by gmlevine
” In DogsBite the Complainant is located in Texas and the Respondent appears to be a coalition of parties located in the United Kingdom and New York. [read post]