Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 9601 - 9620
of 19,272
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2018, 6:40 am
This conclusion is in fact also prompted by the following consideration: if, on the one hand, we accept that solutions like the one of the Dutch Supreme Court in Kecofa v Lancôme, ie that copyright could vest in a perfume, may not be tolerated then, on the other hand, protection could not be denied in a certain work just because it does not belong to one of the categories envisaged by a certain Member State’s list of protectable works. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 5:51 am
The Oklahoma defense has to be considered a big question mark. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 8:24 am
Nystrom v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:00 pm
The complaint fails to state that the child sustained so much as a bruise, redness or swelling. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 4:05 pm
Open justice requires and means scrutiny of the state. [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 9:24 am
By Tyler Baker and Ted Max On September 5, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued its long-awaited and highly anticipated decision in Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 2:48 pm
Advertising: the advertiser can make the mark more/different. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 12:05 pm
ALBERT, in his official capacity as Georgia State University Associate Provost for Information System and Technology, MARK P. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 9:18 am
Aug. 21, 2013) and Alton v. [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 5:39 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 9:51 pm
Thus the mark may not be registered because of Section 2(e)(3).Trademark - Fabulous Fizz New York State Champagne. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 7:24 am
Nor did it provide copies of any written observations filed by the parties, the Commission or the Member States.... [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 7:08 am
” Dere v. [read post]
15 Jan 2025, 7:15 am
Batterton v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 7:01 am
The Hungarian provisions had been adopted to transpose Article 3(1)(e)(ii) and (iii) of the previous Trade Marks Directive 2008/95 into Hungarian law. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 7:04 am
Co., 24 AD3d 1179, 1182 [2005] [internal quotation marks and brackets omitted]). [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 4:03 pm
In an opinion piece published on 30 March 2019 in The Washington Post, Facebook chief executive Mark Zuckerberg called for more regulation of the internet. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 1:25 am
The Glad Products Company et al (Docket Report) Simonian - False patent marking standing motion decided without briefing: Simonian v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 4:58 am
The District Court Judge then explained that “Wolff challenges both the government's initial acquisition of his electronic devices and the lawfulness of the two state warrants that the government obtained to search them. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 2:31 pm
Supreme Court's unanimous opinion in the "ceded lands" case, Hawaii v. [read post]
