Search for: "In re E.G."
Results 9621 - 9640
of 13,720
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2012, 9:59 am
They’re not circumventing because they’re not bypassing, avoiding, hacking, etc. but using. [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 6:37 pm
And, in a sense, one can begin to re-imagine jurisprudence in developed states as different variations of semiotic goo that serves as an important element of providing the objects of signification with which the social collective can build, maintain, order, and protect its ideal vision of itself--and occasionally use it to protect itself. [read post]
6 May 2010, 4:12 pm
E.g., Mean v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 7:39 pm
If crisis masks the pain of transformation, then what moves Wang to consider class struggle as its antidote might also suggest the avoidance of pain through the performance of the past, and the re-creation of its forms. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 4:01 am
The policy also provides that a few categories of calls are exempt from fees (e.g. for remanded and immigration hold prisoners) and that certain types of calls (e.g. to lawyers or the Ombudsman) are free. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 1:32 pm
They’re accessing news during the day, and searching more on the weekend. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 6:15 am
I leave all of that to others (e.g., here). [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 4:43 pm
See, e.g., In re BioScrip, Inc. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 3:47 pm
Moderator: Pamela Samuelson, Berkeley Law School From Notice-and-Takedown to Content Licensing and Filtering: How the Absence of UGC Monetization Rules Impacts Fundamental Rights João Quintais, University of Amsterdam with Martin Senftleben, University of Amsterdam Human rights impact of the new rules. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 1:40 pm
I have certainly been arguing this position since before many of the current crop of elite influence leaders learned to connect state-enterprise-human rights (e.g., From Moral Obligation to International Law; Geo. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 1:13 am
With the statement of the grounds of appeal the appellant re-submitted the main request, filed new auxiliary requests 1 to 6 and submitted arguments to the effect that the subject-matter of claim 1 of all the requests was not excluded from patentability pursuant to Article 53(b) EPC.Claim 1 of the main request read:"1. [read post]
2 Jan 2022, 4:01 pm
Customs Import Illegal Trafficking of Cultural Property Taking Seizure (Here in Switzerland) Is the U.S. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 6:36 am
What this chapter suggests is the importance of the rhetorical strategies of Resist-Reconcile (忤合 Wuhe)[4]in the long arc of central authority strategies for the re-incorporation of Hong Kong into the heart of the nation. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 10:37 am
In other words, if you’re not presently taking advantage of your gear’s autodialer capabilities, or if your gear doesn’t have those capabilities to start off with, you’re not going to run afoul of the TCPA. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 3:01 pm
Claim 1 of the main request before the Board in T 1782/09 read:A game apparatus having an operation unit (1406) which inputs an operation to a game, a display unit (1405) which displays information associated with the game, and a storage 10 unit (1403) which stores data required to execute the game, the game apparatus comprising:means for generating display data of falling objects (101, 102, 103, 104) which are displayed to fall from an upper portion to a lower portion in a predetermined display… [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 8:03 pm
(Incidentally, if you wish to discount my comments because you think I’m a Democrat, or even a Democrat sympathizer, you’re not only wrong: you’re stupid. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 4:58 am
Singer: If we’re looking at someone and want to see the response; if there’s something unique about the complaint and we’re trying to figure out what’s going on. [read post]
12 Apr 2009, 7:19 am
All that said, you’re where the rubber meets the road on this issue. [read post]
2 May 2010, 7:58 am
But what if you’re a freelancer? [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 1:00 pm
Presumably, these balloon payments and other expenses will need to be paid from “net income,” which the CFPB re-defines for long-term credit, but the proposed rule does not actually state this. [read post]
