Search for: "State v. Little"
Results 9621 - 9640
of 23,582
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2024, 12:49 pm
United States, the U.S. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 3:57 pm
Co. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 2:25 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 8:43 am
Tuesday’s argument in McLane v. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 4:08 pm
United States. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 5:04 pm
Cal. 2011), and U.S. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 10:04 am
Texas Sec. of State, 2020 WL 5367216 (W.D. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 5:08 pm
Although these facts only help YouTube’s legal posture a little, the lawsuit’s discovery process has unveiled some non-public information about Viacom’s practices that should be interesting to the FTC and state attorney generals. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 7:00 am
As the Supreme Court of Canada stated in Crookes v. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 9:28 pm
In the challenge by 26 states to Congress’s decision in the Affordable Care Act to expand Medicaid coverage — an expansion that the states claim will simply bust their budgets – the states are relying upon the so-called “coercion theory.” This has to do with the conditions that Congress tells states they must meet in order to qualify for federal funds to help pay for a public program. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 8:01 am
Here is a little background. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 7:01 pm
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Parker Drilling Management Service, Ltd. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 5:00 am
Accord University of South Alabama v. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 4:22 pm
Jackson and United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 9:29 pm
In Hypertouch v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 8:45 am
First up is Kimble v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 7:56 am
Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 5:42 pm
” I have little doubt it will pass, and that (since it is an amendment to the OK Constitution) it is constitutional. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 4:02 am
United States for a significant step in its reasoning. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 7:44 am
State of New York, 3 F.3d 581 (2d Cir.1993), overruled by implication on other grounds by Seminole Tribe v. [read post]
