Search for: "Does 1 to 10"
Results 9721 - 9740
of 43,000
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2010, 9:30 pm
Jane Doe #3Between Sept. 1, 2005, and Nov. 10, 2005, Wagner pulled over Jane Doe #3, an undocumented Spanish speaking woman, on four occasions while on-duty in a marked patrol car. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 3:40 pm
” Id. at *1.Held: “We hold that it does not. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 3:48 pm
Id. at *1. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 12:33 pm
That's because—just like 20 years ago—the Internet needs more, not less, strong encryption. 1. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 12:23 pm
Id. at *1. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 10:12 am
Sunday SurprisesImage credits: JY-FlickrPREVIOUSLY ON NEVER TOO LATENever Too Late 166 [week ending Sunday 1 October] Book Review: What if we could reimagine copyright? [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 12:00 pm
§ 6-103(b)(1)]. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 2:16 pm
State of South Carolina, et al., South Carolina’s Supreme Court did what I predicted it might: holding that article I, section 10 of the South Carolina Constitution created a protected (albeit limited) privacy interest in the right to abortion.[1] Planned Parenthood stemmed from a challenge to S.C. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 1:11 am
However, truck accident liability does not always fall to the driver. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 3:04 pm
Jan. 10, 2017). [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 10:50 am
" Brief at 1. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 5:02 pm
Illnesses in Alaska (2), Oregon (1), Ohio (1) and Washington (6). [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 5:58 am
The information in the agenda is described as current as of May 10, 2013. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 10:58 am
§ 101.021(1)(A) (Vernon 2011). [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 11:57 am
Last week the IPKat, intrigued by a reference for a ruling for a preliminary ruling of the European Court of Justice in a case he knew nothing about, Case C-4/10 Bureau National Interprofessionnel du Cognac v Oy Gust. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 3:19 pm
Majorstake Limited (Respondents) v Curtis (Appellant) [2008] UKHL 10. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 10:20 pm
I finished mile 1 in 6:43. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 11:46 am
Hartman, No. 10-CV-446S, 2016 WL 7208753 (W.D.N.Y. [read post]
27 Sep 2012, 7:59 am
Being in the “flow state” is what most professionals want but system today does not focus on providing this. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
Each side had 1 hr. 40 mins. for closing arguments, which lasted until after 1:00 p.m. [read post]
