Search for: "United States v. Lively"
Results 9721 - 9740
of 11,411
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2010, 8:37 am
The United States has a formal policy on the subject of laptop border searches readily available; Canada doesn’t. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 5:47 pm
In Harris v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
” That opinion, Bowers v. [read post]
20 Jul 2008, 6:34 pm
Desmond v. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 9:03 pm
Cuomo and South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 1:00 am
,SwitzerlandSwitzerland to introduce regulation for patent attorneys: (BLOG@IP::JUR)United Kingdom2007 Annual IP Crime Report released by UK-IPO: (BLOG@IP::JUR), (IAM)Patents Act 2004 (Commencement No. 4 and Transitional Provisions) Order 2007 has been published in order to put in place the final batch of changes to the UK Patents Act 1977 made by the Patents Act 2004: (IPKat)United StatesUnited States Supreme Court to clarify patent… [read post]
7 Dec 2019, 7:52 am
Decisions this Week United KingdomGilham v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 4:19 pm
In 2011, Tam sought to register The Slants as a trademark with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 10:00 pm
, (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (more from Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Washington State Patent Law Blog), (Harold Wegner), Global101 reasons for not selling your unused trade marks: (IPKat),ICANN to battle domain name tasting: (Trademark Blog), (related coverage from Trademark Blog),Is a patent a monopoly? [read post]
17 Feb 2025, 12:46 pm
See United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 11:00 pm
“Tool Without A Handle: A Duty of Candor” The law and legal professional ethics require of counsel a duty of candor in the practice of law.[1] This includes a duty to not knowingly make false statements of fact, to not conceal controlling legal authority, and to not offer evidence the lawyer knows to be false.[2] These principles are considered essential to maintaining both substantive fairness for participants in the process, and trust in the integrity of the process for… [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm
He also gutted funding for the United Nations Population Fund, which provides family planning services globally.He then crafted a “domestic gag rule” that imposed the same restrictions on organizations in the United States, something not done by previous Republican presidents. [read post]
20 May 2024, 5:01 am
This was already the question in 1996 when [Ruth Bader] Ginsburg penned the majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 5:30 am
And it is now my great privilege to introduce the 46th President of the United States, Joe Biden. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 5:11 pm
The Lago Agrio plaintiffs sought relief from the courts of the United States, where Chevron was based. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 5:32 am
” People v. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 1:32 pm
In People v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 4:47 am
And that it’s fine to upend well-established administrative enforcement mechanisms across the federal government, at least until Congress goes back and inserts “notwithstanding section 1331 of title 28, United States Code” into a dozen or more statutes. [read post]
17 Oct 2024, 1:37 pm
In all likelihood, the California Supreme Court or the United States Supreme Court will eventually consider whether the EFAA’s impact is as broad as Liu and Doe have held. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:37 am
Here’s the 9th District’s recitation of the facts in State v. [read post]
