Search for: "Herring v. State" Results 9741 - 9760 of 58,141
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2020, 6:28 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
Nonetheless, the employer stated that it had dismissed her because of a lack of competence. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 10:48 am by Lyle Denniston
The petition, filed July 14, is a follow-up to the Court’s ruling on June 23 (Stern v. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 10:40 am
  Over three months later, the judge dismissed the appeal stating that he would give his reasons later. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In the event the federal Merit Systems Protection Board finds that a state or a local officer or employee has not been removed for his or her office or employment within 30 days after notice of a determination by the Board that he or she has violated §1502 of the Act, "and that the violation warrants removal" of the individual from such office; or 2. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In the event the federal Merit Systems Protection Board finds that a state or a local officer or employee has not been removed for his or her office or employment within 30 days after notice of a determination by the Board that he or she has violated §1502 of the Act, "and that the violation warrants removal" of the individual from such office; or 2. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 1:04 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Current rules give unfair advantage to mass-litigation attorneys targeting Texas consumersLabeau v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 9:29 am by Buck Mann
 Village Homes challenged the award in a later enforcement action in court, arguing that the arbiter had exceeded her powers, and that the arbiter had not provided any stated basis for the award of attorneys’ fees. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 7:34 am by Anna Christensen
§ 3582(c)(2) as “sentencings at which [United States v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 9:50 am by Meg Martin
Lozano, State Public Defender; Tina N. [read post]
  Williams v The London Borough of Hackney [2018] UKSC 37 was about the opposite scenario; where a local authority wanted to accommodate but the parents wanted the children back. [read post]