Search for: "STATE v KEYS"
Results 9761 - 9780
of 20,049
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2013, 10:44 am
Posted by John LewisThe Sutherland v. [read post]
15 May 2017, 1:06 am
As Kitchin LJ said in Maier v ASOS [2015]EWCA Civ 220, the key question is "whether the use that Asos has made of the sign ASOS has been in accordance with honest practices in industrial or commercial matters. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 2:04 am
The Court, however, applying the principles of construction established in Arnold v Britton, Wood v Capita and Rainy Sky, found that on a correct construction, the 1997 licence only licensed Ford’s US federal trade marks, and not any others. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 10:08 am
Designs, Ltd. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 4:32 pm
(Supreme Court of Ohio in LRC Realty, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 4:46 am
Ct. 2653 (2011), protecting promotional communications as commercial speech; next, the Second Circuit in United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 4:49 am
Of course, the Commission could have taken forceful measures against Samsung and Google if it had been willing to take the risk of the CJEU's Huawei v. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 12:00 pm
Digital Verification Systems v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:43 am
Atari v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 8:17 am
In particular, we have identified four key issues for debt buyers to consider given the current state of the law. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 8:17 am
In particular, we have identified four key issues for debt buyers to consider given the current state of the law. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 2:24 am
There are several key points to keep in mind. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 9:00 pm
As a result, relevant courtroom experience is key. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:31 pm
" See, Gardner v. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 2:28 pm
Borello & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 9:09 am
by Dennis Crouch Tinnus Enterprises v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 12:58 pm
Department for Business, Energy and Industry Strategy v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 2:21 pm
However, the key issue was whether the YOT social worker was exercising a social services function in this apparent assessment of TG as a 'child in need', thus making the referral to the HPU akin to the position in R (G) v Southwark LBC [2009] 1 WLR 1299 (our report here), or not, in which case the situation would be akin to R (M) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC [2008] 1 WLR 535 (our report here). [read post]
22 May 2007, 2:10 am
The Court's 24-page opinion in North American Catholic Educational Programming, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 11:11 am
From Park v. [read post]
