Search for: ""citizen's united""
Results 961 - 980
of 3,970
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2008, 8:28 am
Lyle Denniston writes Kucinich Seeks to Get on Texas Ballot (I expect this application to fail) and Court Appeal Set on Promo of Campaign Film (about the Citizens United case). [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 4:00 am
Today's New York Times examines how the Supreme Court's anticipated ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 7:17 pm
Review of Books piece that when the Supreme Court engages in "strict scrutiny" of legislative regulation of corporate speech (as in the Citizens United case), the Court is really strict, but when national security is the governmental interest, "strict scrutiny" is something altogether different. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 1:09 pm
Foundation for Excellence in Tax Scholarship and the American College of Tax Counsel: First Prize ($5,000): Michael Behrens (UCLA), Citizens United, Tax Policy, and Corporate Governance (Faculty Sponsor: Steven Bank) Second Prize (tie)... [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 12:16 pm
In 2010, the Supreme Court ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 11:37 am
He figures, thanks to Citizens United, there are two "persons"... [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 5:32 pm
Tomorrow, while I'm flying to the Georgia state conference on Citizens United, my piece for Slate on Joe Miller's lawsuit on the write-in controversy should appear. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 7:28 am
Here is the abstract: The United States Supreme Court decided in Citizens United v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 12:35 am
Forbes: IRS Targeting Scandal: Citizens United, Lois Lerner And The $20M Tax Saga That Won't Go Away, by Kelly Phillips Erb: It was the question heard round the tax world. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 9:55 am
In the week following the Supreme Court's decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 9:18 am
Citizens United is not. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 10:44 am
A fellow named Bret Michael Dykes in article written for Yahoo news makes much of the fact that a majority of Americans are opposed to the Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Citizens United: A new Washington Post-ABC News poll finds that the vast majority of Americans are vehemently opposed to a recent Supreme Court ruling that [...] [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 10:47 am
Our newest featured column is by Richard Esenberg, professor of law at Marquette, on the Supreme Court's recent Citizens United decision. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 4:52 am
Professor Min examines corporate constitutional law in recent examples such as Citizens United, through the lens of... [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 2:00 am
Here is the abstract: With a brief order issued at the end of its last term, the Supreme Court dramatically raised the stakes in Citizens United v.... [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 4:26 pm
(David Bernstein) From the Oct. 31 issue of Time, re Citizens United: I feel strongly that the court made a serious mistake in finding that money is the equivalent of protected speech. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 11:46 am
Bainbridge takes issue with Justice Stevens's position, in his dissent in Citizens United, that corporations have been "effectively delegated responsibility for ensuring society's economic welfare. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 2:51 pm
Writing in dissent in Citizens United, Justice Stevens asserted: “Nothing in this analysis turns on whether the corporation... [read post]
17 May 2012, 11:20 am
George Will gets to the essence of this grotesque assault on civil liberties, fed by demagoguery over the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision: McGovern [Rep. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 7:25 am
Fred Wertheimer has written this WaPo oped: “While we cannot end all super PACs, as long as the Citizens United decision stands, we can eliminate the type of candidate-specific super PACs being used in the presidential campaign. [read post]
