Search for: "C. v. C."
Results 961 - 980
of 56,466
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2011, 3:20 am
McCarthy v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Case C-434/09); [2011] WLR (D) 153 “Parliament and Council Directive 2004/38/EC was not applicable to a European Union citizen who had never exercised their right of free movement, who had always resided in a member state of which they were a national and who was also a national of another member state. [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 7:33 am
§ 924(c). [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 3:13 am
The contributions are Esin Örücü, 'General introduction: mixed legal systems at new frontiers' Vernon Valentin Palmer, 'Two rival theories of mixed legal systems' Esin Örücü, 'What is a mixed legal system: exclusion or expansion? [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 8:06 am
The ABA’s amicus in Lee v. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 4:48 pm
Rejection of C Plea Agreement held to be an abuse of discretion;Case remanded for resentencing by different judge In United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 9:15 pm
" The authors take exception to the judgment of the Court of Justice in Case C-144/04 Werner Mangold v. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 4:37 pm
C 13-03775 WHA, C 13-04727 WHA.) [read post]
6 May 2014, 8:46 am
Curso: Puerto Rico in Crisis – Current Topics in Public and Private Sector Restructurings and Bankruptcies Luis C. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 1:41 am
Comment The Court of Appeal noted that it was unfortunate that the trial judge was not referred to Hallen v Brabantia. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 9:14 am
Karen C. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 2:14 am
Oguz v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Centre for Advice on Individual Rights in Europe intervening) C-186/10; [2011] WLR (D) 259 “Article 41(1) of the Additional Protocol, signed on 23 November 1970 at Brussels and concluded, approved and confirmed on behalf of the Community by Council Regulation (EEC) No 2760/72 (OJ 1973 C 113 p17), had to be interpreted as meaning that it could be relied on by a Turkish national who, having… [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:16 am
In United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 7:51 am
St.2010, c.256, s.125, effective this week, allows prosecutors to seek pretrial detention under MGL c.276, s.58A for anyone charged with a felony for possession of a firearm under MGL c.269, s.10 (a), (c) or (m) (with some exceptions).The law was enacted after the SJC ruled last year in Comm. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 8:55 am
App. 2015) (quoting Miller v. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 3:58 am
Cummins-Allison Corp. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 10:52 pm
& C. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 10:30 am
Filburn: Agriculture, Aggregation, and Commerce (Constitutional Law Stories, Michael C. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 2:55 am
& Council and Case C-157/21, Pol. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 8:57 am
Y pues ya me han estado despejando dudas vía correo electrónico aqui en DDD, pero siento que encontré otro obstáculo: no puedo tramitar mi reporte de crédito especial en buró de crédito porque no tengo a la mano mis estados de cuenta (y por ende los límites de c´redito de mis líneas) Y pregunto, ... [read post]
25 May 2014, 7:59 am
District Court for the District of North DakotaGuttormson v. [read post]
