Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 961 - 980
of 14,892
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2020, 6:06 am
However an applicant would be entitled to produce documents proving the accuracy or inaccuracy of a matter of common knowledge. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 7:37 am
But that was a false advertising theory, not a trademark infringement theory, since there was no claim that the marks weren’t applied to genuine Adobe products, or that “Adobe Acrobat Pro” was only the mark for the non-academic/OEM version. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm
[I think this is a matter of leveraging reciprocity norms; Ramsey mentions guilt.] [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 4:41 am
Like Mark, I don’t doubt that humans have done terrible harm to the environment. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 7:07 am
No matter what your specimen, it is essential that it reflect the use of the mark as contemplated by your description of goods and/or services. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 9:24 am
We're allowed to be completely silly on a Friday afternoon, heading into a weekend that marks the end of summer, aren't we? [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 4:47 am
T 1955/12: User preferences and a patentable medical injection deviceIn this appeal from an opposition, the Board discussed the novelty and inventive step of a medical injection device having a housing that can be customized. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 5:50 am
These are resources and time better devoted to more meritorious matters. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 4:09 am
Gould, 866 F.2d at 1392 (“When the case between the parties has been settled, there is no actual matter in controversy essential to the decision of the particular case[.] [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 10:46 pm
The statute doesn't say that the Statement of Use must be signed by the owner of the mark, just filed by the owner. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 6:09 am
But that didn’t matter if there was non-trademark use. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 6:00 am
Don't mind us while we disinfect your question by striking the reference to copyright infringement; here's an explanation of the difference between TMs and copyrights.Similar marks and similar services? [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 10:56 am
That license didn’t retroactively turn all of his pre-2001 uses into (1) uses as a mark or (2) uses as SMRI’s mark. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 7:20 am
(Ugh, why not just do fair use as a matter of law?) [read post]
14 May 2012, 5:01 pm
According to the established case law (see T 381/02 [2.3.7] and T 1855/07 [2.2-4]), such a combination cannot be considered to be a substantive amendment (sachliche Änderung) that would allow for an objection of lack of clarity pursuant to A 84 EPC 1973 for combinations of granted claims. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 8:19 am
Also worth a read is Written Description's own Lisa Larrimore Ouellette's response, called Does Running Out of (Some) Trademarks Matter? [read post]
28 Sep 2013, 11:33 pm
The founders Stephen and Juliette Wall later explained on Twitter: “We made the decision six years ago to trade mark Pho, when Vietnamese food wasn’t as common on the high street and we only had one restaurant, to protect what we hoped would eventually become a successful restaurant business.The trade mark we own simply means only we can operate a restaurant under the name Pho (in the UK) as our restaurant brand name, but of course the word can be used in many… [read post]
15 May 2024, 2:15 am
Nevertheless, the matter still seems to be evaluated on a case-by-case approach. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 3:52 am
" The Board observed that "[i]t is common knowledge that beer and wine are frequently sold in the same stores to the same class of purchasers, namely, adult members of the general public. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 6:37 am
Thuan Phong also sought judgment as a matter of law. [read post]
