Search for: "People v. Case"
Results 961 - 980
of 52,272
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2019, 4:47 pm
In the case of R (P, G and W) and Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Anor [2019] UKSC 3 the Supreme Court upheld challenges to the legal regimes for disclosing criminal records in England and Wales, and Northern Ireland, finding them to be incompatible with Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (“ECHR”). [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 5:06 am
[This seems to jive pretty well with the other recent capital murder case on this issue, Luna v. [read post]
13 Jul 2024, 4:59 am
Supreme Court upheld in Husted v. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 10:59 am
On Wednesday, April 25, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in one of the biggest cases of the year: Trump v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 12:05 pm
In People v. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 7:47 am
On July 13, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of Foley v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 8:37 pm
X appeals to the NY Court of Appeals, which ruled 4-3 today (People v. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 9:13 am
I've also seen a plethora of dismissal cases come up to the Court of Appeal as a result. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 2:30 pm
The Court of Appeal holds that it's not a sufficient basis for a new trial, at least given the trial court's evidentiary findings in the present case. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 11:20 am
Not the kind of police work you typically see in a murder case.) [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 11:22 am
Here's something you don't see every day.It's a murder case. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 1:26 pm
The California Supreme Court affirms the conviction and death sentence in this case, in which the defendant represented himself (always unwise) and waived the right to a jury trial (almost always unwise in a capital case). [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 1:58 pm
I get that in some cases, telling a defendant that they can only represent themselves if they do it at the outset of the trial (rather than asking for such relief at the penalty phase) is a total nonstarter, because there's no way a non-lawyer can possibly defend a capital case on the merits. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 6:00 am
The Court held that the plaintiffs in Gill v Whitford, 585 U. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 11:05 am
While I am "counsel of record" in this case, a great team of people listed on the cover of the brief plus several students in... [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 3:33 am
Kidding aside, there is one civil case of significant interest next week, Burlingame v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 12:12 pm
So it makes perfect sense to decide the case as if the translation is entirely accurate.But when you're translating things, it's often very hard to decide whether something "makes sense" (i.e., is equivocal and/or unclear) or not. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 12:14 pm
By David Worley In Zagaja v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 8:22 pm
Evans and the California state court litigation over same-sex marriage, but I had another case in mind: Bush v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:21 pm
Before today, I don't think I'd ever read a case that held due process satisfied in the case of a formal court order when the defendant never ever received that order. [read post]
