Search for: "Price v. State"
Results 961 - 980
of 11,976
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2017, 12:52 pm
Irvine v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 8:13 am
Press v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 8:13 am
Press v. [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 7:51 am
Applying Stack and Oxley v Hiscock [2004] EWCA Civ 546, the judge at first instance accepted this contention, stating that he had to consider what was just and fair between the parties having regard to the whole course of dealing between them. [read post]
26 Dec 2007, 12:00 am
Since the Supreme Court decided Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 4:59 pm
In its June 2014 decision in Halliburton Co. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 6:06 am
Look no further than Price v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 6:03 am
Class representatives and their counsel in the Vitamin C Antitrust Litigation have won another initial round in their suit alleging that Chinese vitamin C manufacturers conspired to fix prices and to limit the output of vitamin C exported to the United States. [read post]
30 Nov 2019, 8:55 am
"That quote is also interesting with a view to the recently-filed Intel and Apple v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
For example, under the doctrine set forth in the 1979 case of United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 7:12 am
Last Thursday, however, the First Department reinstated one cause of action under General Business Law § 342-a, which allows for the recovery of civil penalties by the Attorney General (State of New York v Daicel Chem. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 6:15 am
Additional Resources: Gonsalves v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 7:24 am
Hyatt Corp. v. [read post]
22 May 2008, 11:08 pm
BOTELHO, Petitioners v. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 7:06 am
State-law fraud/consumer protection claims might have been better under the circumstances.) [read post]
3 May 2012, 12:01 am
United States. [read post]
25 May 2012, 7:29 am
The United States Supreme Court’s decisions in Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 6:00 am
On top of the dangers to consumers, the legal market would also suffer, as untaxed and unregulated products would have significant competitive advantages over high-priced legal products. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 5:46 am
In Hertz Corp. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 3:51 pm
The Ninth Circuit noted that, in some cases, this might not be entirely easy to ascertain, stating: "We acknowledge a creeping absurdity in our holding. [read post]
