Search for: "State v. Clayton" Results 961 - 980 of 1,034
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2021, 12:12 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Transgender Employment Discrimination Risks Rising In 2020, the United States Supreme Court ruled in Bostock v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 4:30 am by Nick Farr
It's ironic that, even as we see the federal government assert its authority over local affairs in legislation such as PPACA and cases like United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 8:08 am by Hedge Fund Lawyer
  Such a position would entail a facts and circumstances determination, and taking such a position is likely a risky strategy based on recent comments from SEC Chairman Clayton. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 6:51 pm
In the context of merger analysis, a noted authority on antitrust law, sums up stating that: “[f]or antitrust purposes,…. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Stated in the form of 13 individual guidelines for assessing M&A activity, the draft document reads like an outline of every way the FTC and DOJ might challenge a deal as meeting the Clayton Act’s prohibition: a transaction where the effect “may be substantially to lessen competition, or to tend to create a monopoly. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  Will he lead the “transformation” that the United States desperately needs? [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by Noah Brown
Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:53 am by David Kopel
" Methodology I started with the Appendix to Clayton E. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 4:49 pm by Kevin LaCroix
California’s enactment of this privacy legislation raises the question whether other states will follow suit. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 4:49 pm by Kevin LaCroix
California’s enactment of this privacy legislation raises the question whether other states will follow suit. [read post]
3 May 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
[Eagle-eyed readers might notice that the court cites Saunders v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
The FTC summarily states that a “hypothetical monopolist of accessible luxury handbags likely would undertake a SSNIPT on consumers” and could do so profitably. [read post]