Search for: "Tom Goldstein" Results 961 - 980 of 1,028
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2019, 2:47 pm by Kevin LaCroix
D&O insurance policies sometimes contain Major Shareholder Exclusions, precluding coverage for claims brought by shareholders’ with ownership percentages above a certain specified ownership threshold. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 8:00 pm by John Ehrett
  Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 1:32 pm by Kevin LaCroix
 As Tom Goldstein at SCOTUSblog wrote last Thursday: “For the December sitting, only the Janus securities fraud case is outstanding. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:00 pm by John Ehrett
  Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 10:30 am by Maureen Johnston
  Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 7:40 am by Mary Dwyer
 Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
28 May 2010, 4:23 am by Eric Turkewitz
Howe and Russell was formerly Goldstein & Howe, before founding partner Tom Goldstein (founder of SCOTUSblog) moved on to Akin Gump. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 8:05 am by Maureen Johnston
  Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 10:00 am
  I would be most honored if you would support my efforts to become the first openly gay public official in the borough.I have been endorsed by NYS Senator Tom Duane, NYC Council Member Rosie Mendez, the Working Families Party, the United Federation of Teachers (UFT), NYS Assembly Member Jose Peralta (Jackson Heights), NYC Council Member Julissa Ferreras (Corona/Jackson Heights), the League of Humane Voters and the Jim Owles Liberal Democratic Club, among others.I invite you to… [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 7:47 pm by Ben Cheng
 Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 7:05 pm by Mary Dwyer
  Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
  Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
14 May 2012, 6:53 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
UPDATE: Tom Goldstein has a similar reaction to Toobin’s narrative about Chief Justice Roberts: The theme of the piece is that Chief Justice Roberts orchestrated the case’s metamorphosis from a narrow ruling about statutory construction to a much broader constitutional decision with sweeping implications for campaign finance. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 11:16 pm
http://t.co/HtezHKd Tom Goldstein predicts Breyer op. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 12:32 pm by Tom Goldstein and Dan Stein
She joined Akin Gump and worked to expand the firm’s appellate litigation practice, alongside this blog’s Tom Goldstein. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 6:13 am
  A panel of constitutional scholars, moderated by SCOTUSblog's own Tom Goldstein, also addressed the potential impact of the upcoming term yesterday, gathering in Washington to discuss the significance of the cases on the Court's calendar. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 4:22 pm by Lisa McElroy
  Speaking of oral argument, this week’s arguments will feature Supreme Court veterans like David Boies, Tom Goldstein (of this blog), and John Elwood (also of this blog). [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 6:52 am by Kali Borkoski
Disclaimer: Goldstein & Russell, P.C. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 4:29 am by Maxwell Kennerly
For those of us who have long appreciated SCOTUSBlog being there, being the first resource for Supreme Court decisions, briefs, reports, it seems unfair and unappreciative to question Tom Goldstein’s effort to make money off his blog and further his career as a Supreme Court litigator. [read post]
13 May 2020, 9:37 am by Amy Howe
Yesterday the Supreme Court heard oral argument in a set of cases that Deputy Solicitor General Jeffrey Wall, who argued on behalf of the federal government, described as “truly historic. [read post]