Search for: "United States v. Clinton" Results 961 - 980 of 1,353
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
From that it follows that it is impermissible to base state policies on claimsabout the divine will. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 11:14 am by Helen Klein
To retroactivity and fair notice broadly, the brief argues, “no accused could have had notice that the laws of war applied in Yemen in 2000”—and in fact, “the President and Congress’s pronouncements that the United States was not at war in Yemen provided notice that the laws of w [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 6:52 pm
The United States has the programs to deny trade benefits. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 12:42 pm by msatta
And we must; according to the Center for American Women and Politics at Rutgers University, only 107 women hold seats in the United States Congress, comprising just 20% of the 535 members. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 12:10 pm by Quinta Jurecic, Helen Klein Murillo
Michael Flynn’s contacts with the Russian ambassador to the United States, were likely protected by executive privilege. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 3:29 pm
Freedus responded by referring to a Fifth Circuit case (United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 3:00 am
 The United States has a shameful history of racism and sexism, including official racism and sexism. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 8:41 am by Nathaniel Sobel
But two new sources of information—the fifth volume of the Senate Select Intelligence Committee’s bipartisan report on Russian interference in the 2016 election and New York Times reporter Michael Schmidt’s new book “Donald Trump v. the United States”—raise even more questions about the investigation. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 7:29 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
The worst offender in this regard is American political science, both in the sense of the sub-field that studies the United States and the scholarship and institutions (i.e. political science departments, associations, journals) of the country. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 10:00 pm by Dan Flynn
But with the case of the United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 12:15 pm by Alan Z. Rozenshtein
But why do such figures, whether in the United States or other democracies, rarely get close to the highest levels of power? [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 3:57 pm
United States, 83 U.S. (16 Wall.) 147, 151 (1873). [read post]
1 Jan 2007, 11:15 pm
Harlan worries that the amount under guidelines will set off an appeal in the Second Circuit.Harlan is right back to us on Saturday morning with this post concerning whether the Second Circuit panel in United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 3:16 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed in the Denver Post, Joseph Smith Jr. weighs in on Endrew F. v. [read post]