Search for: "Peoples v. United States" Results 9781 - 9800 of 19,958
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2017, 11:11 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-5165 Issue: Whether Richardson v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 9:43 am by Hanlon Law, PA
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in a 1966 case called United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 4:00 pm
Consider the case constantly referred to in decisions this year by courts at both the state and federal level: Jacobson v. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 9:43 am by Venkat Balasubramani
The Court rejects the argument advanced by the United States, as amicus, that this amounted to “informational injury” that was sufficient to confer standing. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 5:07 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Relying on Matter of Campbell v Pesce (60 NY2d 165), the Court held thatAlthough the constitutional Double Jeopardy Clauses do not bar a second prosecution where the prior judgment of conviction has been vacated upon the defendant's motion or appeal because of an error in the proceedings (see Lockhart v Nelson, 488 US 33, 38; United States v Tateo, 377 US 463, 465-467), the 2003 judgment of conviction has never been vacated. [read post]
4 May 2021, 4:23 pm by Sandy Levinson
  He wanted to lead an independent Lakota Sioux Nation, a juridical equal to the United States of America (and with no duty to take account of a subordinate entity like Montana or South Dakota). [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 4:03 pm by Michel-Adrien
 Five people died in the riots.Earlier posts on the topic include:US Glossary on Treason, Sedition, Insurrection (The Marshall Project, January 8, 2021): "In the 24 hours since a mob incited by the president of the United States stormed the Capitol attempting to halt the functioning of American democracy, the news media and everyone else have been at a loss for words to describe what happened. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:02 pm by Stephen Page
When the union fell apart, Monasky took A.M.T., their two-month-old daughter, from Italy to the United States. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 6:21 am
In the United Kingdom and other Council of Europe member states, following the 1981 decision of the European Court of Human Rights in Dudgeon v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The Supreme Court was sensitive to just this concern when it defined religion broadly for purposes of the conscientious objector statute governing military service in the 1965 case of United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 7:39 pm by Gregory Sisk
In 1946, in the Federal Tort Claims Act, the federal government enacted a limited waiver of its sovereign immunity, allowing people to sue the United States in federal court for torts committed by agents of the federal government. [read post]