Search for: "State v. Childs"
Results 9781 - 9800
of 18,925
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2015, 1:57 pm
Egan v. [read post]
10 Sep 2024, 7:09 am
This candidate believes the Indian Child Welfare Act is unconstitutional because two members of the United States Supreme Court dissented in Haaland v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 1:40 pm
The United States Supreme Court today continued with its line of cases favoring children in the decisions of Miller v. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 9:48 am
--In this section: (1) The term ``eligible child'' means a child (as defined in section 12(d) or served under section 11(a)(1) of the Richard B. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 8:46 pm
We all know that by the time the Supreme Court got done with Bush v. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 7:30 am
In the matter of B (A child), heard 8-9 December 2015. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 8:25 am
”) Celestino v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 11:41 am
Supreme Court in Miller v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 10:39 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 9:05 am
On cross appeal, Mother argues that the trial court abused its discretion by finding that Mother waived any argument regarding their child's home state under the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act ("UCCJA"), Ind. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 1:49 pm
The Seventh Circuit’s opinion last week in United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 8:13 am
In the December 16, 2011 opinion in SCDSS v. [read post]
19 Nov 2024, 11:58 am
Criminal defense attorneys across the state welcomed the decision of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals (TCCA) this June when the opinion came down in The State Of Texas v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 8:16 pm
In light of the foregoing Federal and state statutes and regulations, it is clear that Hammond did not jeopardize her own eligibility for Medicaid by transferring her monthly income into the SNT for the benefit of her son, who was both disabled and under 65 years of age (see Reames v State of Oklahoma, 411 F3d at 1164; Estate Planning for a Family with a Special Needs Child, 23 Probate & Property at 16). [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 8:00 am
Zogenix, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 5:26 pm
See State v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 6:00 am
See EEOC v. [read post]
21 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
STATE v. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 9:01 pm
But it would be a risky mistake to dismiss or ignore this latest gambit.Even so, we should not miss the elements of a head-spinning flip-flop that have accompanied this move.In May, following the leak of Justice Samuel Alito’s Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health opinion, Graham praised its embrace of states’ rights.As he put it at the time, “If the Court overturns Roe v. [read post]
