Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 9781 - 9800
of 14,283
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2008, 3:36 am
Making the inarguable point that a State that punishes child rape by death may remove a strong incentive for the rapist not to kill the victim, Kennedy mysteriously feels the need to point curious readers to a St. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 9:00 pm
Boykin v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 11:23 am
Here's an excerpt from the Berkman Center press release: The Citizen Media Law Project (CMLP), with the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), and Public Citizen, submitted an amicus curiae brief to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, urging the court to apply First Amendment scrutiny to the recently resurgent “hot news misappropriation” doctrine in Barclays Capital, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 11:00 am
Fifth, the Court reasoned, it had “previously interpreted similar statutes” – such as the Bail Reform Act, in United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 1:47 am
In Helferich Patent Licensing v. [read post]
30 May 2013, 12:44 pm
The opening sentence should draw you in: A fundamental shift in the relationship between the government and the governed is taking place: by restricting access to the law, the state is handing itself an alarming immunity from legal scrutiny. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 8:29 pm
As the Court explained in United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 7:31 pm
However, with the Court’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 7:56 am
Estate of Walters v. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 7:24 pm
See AlixPartners v. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 6:04 am
V. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 10:30 am
In the original decision, United States v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 10:27 am
Merriwether Co. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 7:14 am
In-Person v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 1:12 pm
Polansky v. [read post]
30 May 2013, 12:44 pm
The opening sentence should draw you in: A fundamental shift in the relationship between the government and the governed is taking place: by restricting access to the law, the state is handing itself an alarming immunity from legal scrutiny. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 4:38 pm
Singer v. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 4:12 pm
Jana Master Fund, Ltd. v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 8:53 am
The Court noted (at [128]) that any pre-notification requirement would only be as strong as the sanctions imposed for failure to observe it. [read post]
