Search for: "Long v State"
Results 9801 - 9820
of 45,377
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2011, 8:53 am
From Miner v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 9:36 am
Facts of the Case In the case of Ten Hagen Excavating, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 1:47 pm
This morning brought decisions in both of the patent cases argued in November, with the government prevailing on the constitutional question raised in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 7:50 am
See Department of Revenue of Ky. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 10:45 am
Certiorari-stage documents Petition for certiorari Memorandum for the United States Wetzel v. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 4:30 am
Indeed, in United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 7:00 am
In Flint v. [read post]
24 Nov 2017, 8:30 am
Here is a brief excerpt from the archival record of the case:"City of Harrodsburg v. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 4:35 am
Although the Supreme Court in Clinton v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 3:04 pm
Under New York's rules of precedent, a decision by one department of the Appellate Division is a state-wide precedent binding on all trial courts so long as it is not contradicted by another panel of the Appellate Division or overruled by the Court of Appeals. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 8:55 am
In Meyer v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 1:44 pm
Some years ago – never mind how long precisely – having little or no money in my purse, and nothing particular to interest me on TV, I thought I would commence reading some patent judgments and see a bit of the workings of the law.Chief among my motives was the overwhelming idea of the great whale of a judgment itself. [read post]
23 May 2011, 6:26 am
” Andrew Pincus, who represented the petitioner in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 12:03 am
., the Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals will hear oral arguments in Maunalua Bay Beach Ohana 28 v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 5:58 am
” United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 2:10 pm
(E.R.) v S(H.C.), 1998 CanLII 4619 [3] W.C.L. v A.J.L, 2003 BCSC 971 [read post]
1 May 2008, 8:33 am
Co. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 6:50 am
An employer could not be held vicariously liable for an after-work accident caused by an employee who was on an extended assignment away from home, ruled the Arizona Supreme Court, resolving a dispute among state courts (Engler v Gulf Interstate Engineering, Inc, July 9, 2012, Berch, R). [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 1:25 pm
Using race in this manner can fall afoul of the Court’s long line of cases beginning with Shaw v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 5:14 am
Amy Dillard discusses Hall v. [read post]
