Search for: "State v. Field"
Results 9821 - 9840
of 11,503
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2011, 8:02 am
Path. et al. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 1:38 am
Celní úrad Tabor) - the English abstract reads as follows: The dogma that claims of the State based on its penal, revenue or other public law are not enforceable abroad – a doctrine also known as the revenue rule – is more and more displaced by European instruments obliging the Member States to collect public law claims of their fellow Member States. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 4:04 am
Article 1(3) of that Directive limits the field of application of the directive to activities falling with the TFEU, thereby excluding matters covered by Titles V and VI of the TEU at that time (e.g. public security, defence, State security). [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 11:07 am
Michael Mabry stated the following in his declaration: “We havenever been contacted by Aurora nor [sic] any of its agents in person, by telephone or byfirst class mail to explore options for us to avoid foreclosure as required in CC § 2923.5. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 9:14 am
From L.W. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 10:30 am
Massachusetts v. [read post]
11 Sep 2024, 4:26 pm
Supreme Court's 2022 New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 12:38 pm
They will not only overturn centuries of common law fair trial protections for those seeking to challenge the actions of the State, but also undermine the vital constitutional principle that no one is above the law, including the Government. [read post]
21 Dec 2014, 4:17 am
United States In Ratzlaf v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 4:08 pm
Clearly, big attention-grabbing cases such as Lloyd Rayney v The State of Western Australia (damages of $1.8m, including damages for economic loss, with another $773,866 in interest), Rebel Wilson v Women’s Day, Women’s Weekly, New Weekly and OK! [read post]
1 Oct 2024, 10:26 am
States had quite different visions for the regime. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 8:48 pm
In this post, we will state the facts of the investment arbitration. [read post]
Letter from AmeriKat I: Bilski, Baby! (Justice Stevens -On the Majority's musings and UK patent law)
18 Jul 2010, 11:41 am
A couple of weeks ago, the AmeriKat wrote about Justice Kennedy's majority opinion in the much-awaited Supreme Court case of Bilski v Kappos. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
As a justice, his dissents in Lochner v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 1:26 pm
Trademark: In Jack Daniel’s v. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 1:00 pm
This phase revolves around Standard Field Sobriety Tests (SFSTs). [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 3:02 am
The three categories identified by Lord Diplock in Council of the Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service (essentially for review of administrative action) are not exhaustive. [read post]
