Search for: "Matter of Thomas" Results 9861 - 9880 of 11,271
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2009, 12:39 pm
  The Democrats are proving, in other words, that they are about  as beholden to the powerful lobbies as the Republicans, that what matters is money, and not the good of the people. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 10:34 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
Justice Thomas’ concurring opinion in this case implored the Court to reconsider other precedents that implicated the substantive due process clause and were “demonstrably erroneous. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 5:07 pm by INFORRM
Prior restraint is a matter for the courts, as the press accepted when it got constraints on the granting of injunctions written into the 1998 Human Rights Act. [read post]
17 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
” How to react to this kind of implausible recasting of the charged crime of election interference into a constitutional matter of individual rights? [read post]
31 May 2017, 4:59 am by Edith Roberts
At The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket blog, David Levine and Thomas Kearns discuss the court’s decision in Midland Funding, LLC v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 7:19 am by Chris Dreyer
Imagine pulling out your phone and recording yourself talking through an ongoing legal matter. [read post]
28 Jun 2008, 3:04 pm
  More on Thomas Haskell's The Emergence of Professional Social Science, after the jump! [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 11:16 am
Though diplomacy is not my long suit, I make every effort to pose such questions in a diplomatic matter. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 7:35 am by Amy Howe
First, he says, the doctrine “has long been questioned by members of this Court, lower-court jurists, and legal scholars” – including by both Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Justice Clarence Thomas. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 1:56 pm
Ed's model can't explain the modern sex equality cases, or, for that matter, much of modern First Amendment jurisprudence, including the commercial speech cases.Ed may not have much of a problem with that. [read post]
” The federal bill, in the House Subcommittee on Courts and Competition Policy, would enable a defendant who believes he is being sued for speaking out or petitioning on a public matter to seek to have the suit dismissed. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 5:15 am
Poor Justice Stevens -- he's stuck on that old chestnut that the person before the district court actually matters at sentencing. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 1:27 am by Seán Binder
Thomas Grove and Vivian Salama reports for the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 7:59 pm by Frank Ravitch
Footnote 3 was the only part of the opinion not joined by Justices Neil Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas, and therefore it only commanded a plurality of justices. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 7:57 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Justice Thomas, in keeping with his usual demeanor, did not ask a question, but he has been in the Court’s majority in other cases enforcing arbitration agreements and is regarded as generally receptive to employer’s views. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
For an example of a question to which there is no determinate answer, let us return once more to the matter of judicial terms.What if instead of impeaching a judge, Congress were to pass a new law simply abolishing the judgeship she holds? [read post]
27 May 2021, 9:03 pm by Laura Welborn
Justice Clarence Thomas, writing for the Court, held that Guam’s previous settlement with EPA would not prohibit Guam from seeking contribution from the Navy for the cleanup under CERCLA. [read post]