Search for: "United States v. Lively" Results 9861 - 9880 of 11,418
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2022, 5:47 pm by Chris Castle
As I told the Judges in my comment, I will focus on a few issues raised by A2IM regarding the CRB settlement process in general, the penny rate structure of the mechanical royalty system in the United States, and their proposal that mechanical licensing for physical configurations be handed over to the Mechanical Licensing Collective. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 2:08 pm by Annemarie Bridy
The leading case in the domain of patents on living organisms is Diamond v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 3:00 pm
At page 51, Justice Scalia, writing for the court, cited a law review article entitled, “The Peculiar Story of United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 10:06 am by Viking
Of course many media outlets are picking up on United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 7:07 am by Lawrence Solum
United States, a unanimous Supreme Court declared federal bench trials constitutionally permissible. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 11:08 am
Perhaps more importantly, the facts of the case signal to asylum applicants that one need not be beaten to the point of hospitalization or brutally raped to have suffered persecution; the real facts that led to flight may alone be enough to obtain protection in the United States. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 11:54 am
 Anyway, a new podcast is available from the CCC's Beyond the Book site: it features a (United States) Suffolk University Law School event in which CCC’s Chris Kenneally speaks with entertainment industry attorney Patti Jones and advertising executive Lenora Cushing; the trio ponder on the way trends in music licensing are changing how rock bands achieve fame and fortune. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 9:45 am by Lefteris K. Travayiakis, Esq.
Both the United States Supreme Court and the Massachusetts Supreme Court have issued decisions guarding against “the power of technology” against privacy rights. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 6:47 am
The decisions of Judge Colin Birss QC in the Patents County Court earlier this year in Dame Vivienne Westwood v Anthony Knight (noted by the IPKat here and here) made fascinating reading. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 11:51 am
  Following substantial briefing and a lengthy hearing, this Court, reviewing the matter de novo, see United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 10:36 am by Mike Scarcella
They also said a judgment against Nguema “will infringe Equatorial Guinea’s sovereign right to create, interpret, and enforce its own laws and will significantly hinder the existing cooperative, friendly relationship between the United States and Equatorial Guinea. [read post]
7 Sep 2006, 4:55 am
Shortly afterwards, the profile was deleted by MySpace.As you would expect a judge to know, parodies of public officials are protected free speech under the 1st Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 1:21 am
  The fact pattern you describe is very similar to a case decided by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio in late 2005, Rowe v. [read post]