Search for: "Long v State" Results 9881 - 9900 of 45,377
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2022, 4:00 pm
This is precisely what happened with the state congressional district maps (for the state senate and state assembly lines). [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 6:05 am by Steven Cohen
Facts: This case (Atmosphere Hospitality Management, LLC v. [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 11:02 am
  In Dow Chemical Company v Organik Kimya, Vice Chancellor Glasscock held that although Dow Chemicals had argued for long-arm jurisdiction over all the foreign defendants, it only extended to Organik Kimya Turkey (the Turkish parent of the US subsidiary). [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 1:06 pm by Rory Little
United States, and then, in two consolidated cases, Stitt and Sims v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 5:22 pm by INFORRM
Although noting that states do have a margin of appreciation in this regard, it was also made clear, citing Perna v. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 2:14 pm by Andrew Hamm
Washington, in their “long conference” last week, and they have relisted it for Friday’s conference.) [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 11:17 am by John Elwood
United States, United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 2:22 am by SHG
McDonald did one thing only, holding that the right enunciated in Heller applies to the states. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 7:31 am by Conor McEvily
” Writing for the online journal Defining Ideas, Richard Epstein critiques the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 3:45 am
Determining eligibility for representation and indemnification of public employees being suedSalino v Cimino, 1 N.Y.3d 166 Public Officers Law Sections 17 [state officers and employees] and 18 [municipal employees] and other local laws provide for the representation and, if found liable, the indemnification, of officers and employees of the jurisdiction who are being sued -- a significant benefit to such individuals. [read post]
5 Oct 2019, 1:01 pm by Kalvis Golde
But no matter how long its history of appellate adjudication, no matter how experienced its attorneys, nothing can quite prepare a state for three Supreme Court oral arguments in 30 days. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 1:50 am by CMS
Art 11 does not confer a right to compulsory collective bargaining, so whilst states are free to provide rights that go further than the ECHR requires, as the UK has done by enacting Sch A1, a state will not be in breach of art 11 if it declines to legislate for compulsory collective bargaining as long as there is an ability voluntarily to enter into collective bargaining. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
(Those procedures were just declared unconstitutional in a parallel state court case, Van Stean v. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 8:45 am by Venkat Balasubramani
CUS Nashville Employee Terminated for Facebook Message Fails to State Public Policy Claim — Barnett v. [read post]