Search for: "Peoples v. United States" Results 9901 - 9920 of 19,962
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2009, 3:33 am
" - Alexander Bickel"We asked for workers and people came. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 1:49 pm by ACLU
Many people excluded from the United States because of the Muslim ban, such as those who received a once-in-a-lifetime immigration visa via the “diversity lottery,” have still not been admitted. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 11:59 am by Jan Baran
Once the Court granted probable jurisdiction in McCutcheon v. [read post]
12 Mar 2011, 6:41 pm by Robin Mashal
Due to the recent tsunami, the axis of the Earth has shifted, and the main island of Japan has moved approximately 8 feet (2.4 meters) closer to the United States' west coast. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 10:47 pm
The Louisiana Supreme Court subsequently upheld the statute despite the United States Supreme Court holding in Coker v. [read post]
9 May 2019, 2:12 pm by Andrew Hamm
Vitale, “declaring that the state may not compel the recitation of a state-composed prayer in schools” Griffin v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
The United States Department of Agriculture’s California Raisin Marketing Order for raisins requires raisin growers in certain years to give percentage of their crop to the government, free of charge. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 4:58 pm by Lolita Buckner Inniss
Loving is as Loving DoesOn June 12, 1967, in the case Loving v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:55 pm
The English speaking Caribbean inherited much of its cultural norms and its legal system from the British colonizers, so that just like the United States, it has a common law system which is a direct descendant of the English common law system and some of the countries still have close ties to the British since they retain the Privy council as their final court of appeal, others have opted to have the newly created Caribbean Court of Justice as their final Court of Appeal. [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 12:00 am by My name
[xiii] An excellent discussion of the legislative history and Congressional intent of this statute is discussed in United States v. [read post]